» Articles » PMID: 36613382

A Comprehensive Overview of Tomato Processing By-Product Valorization by Conventional Methods Versus Emerging Technologies

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Jan 8
PMID 36613382
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The tomato processing industry can be considered one of the most widespread food manufacturing industries all over the world, annually generating considerable quantities of residue and determining disposal issues associated not only with the wasting of invaluable resources but also with the rise of significant environmental burdens. In this regard, previous studies have widely ascertained that tomato by-products are still rich in valuable compounds, which, once recovered, could be utilized in different industrial sectors. Currently, conventional solvent extraction is the most widely used method for the recovery of these compounds from tomato pomace. Nevertheless, several well-known drawbacks derive from this process, including the use of large quantities of solvents and the difficulties of utilizing the residual biomass. To overcome these limitations, the recent advances in extraction techniques, including the modification of the process configuration and the use of complementary novel methods to modify or destroy vegetable cells, have greatly and effectively influenced the recovery of different compounds from plant matrices. This review contributes a comprehensive overview on the valorization of tomato processing by-products with a specific focus on the use of "green technologies", including high-pressure homogenization (HPH), pulsed electric fields (PEF), supercritical fluid (SFE-CO), ultrasounds (UAE), and microwaves (MAE), suitable to enhancing the extractability of target compounds while reducing the solvent requirement and shortening the extraction time. The effects of conventional processes and the application of green technologies are critically analyzed, and their effectiveness on the recovery of lycopene, polyphenols, cutin, pectin, oil, and proteins from tomato residues is discussed, focusing on their strengths, drawbacks, and critical factors that contribute to maximizing the extraction yields of the target compounds. Moreover, to follow the "near zero discharge concept", the utilization of a cascade approach to recover different valuable compounds and the exploitation of the residual biomass for biogas generation are also pointed out.

Citing Articles

Source, Extraction, Properties, and Multifunctional Applications of Pectin: A Short Review.

Yi L, Cheng L, Yang Q, Shi K, Han F, Luo W Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39458710 PMC: 11511015. DOI: 10.3390/polym16202883.


Chemical Characterization and Temporal Variability of Pasta Condiment By-Products for Sustainable Waste Management.

Strani L, Farioli G, Cocchi M, Durante C, Olarini A, Pellacani S Foods. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39335946 PMC: 11431017. DOI: 10.3390/foods13183018.


Valorisation of tomato pomace in anti-pollution and microbiome-balance face cream.

Rajkowska K, Otlewska A, Raczyk A, Maciejczyk E, Krajewska A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20516.

PMID: 39227423 PMC: 11371812. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71323-4.


Extra-virgin olive oil enriched with lycopene: From industrial tomato by-products to consumer.

Fernandez-Pan I, Horvitz S, Ibanez F, Arroqui C, Beriain M, Virseda P Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(8):5815-5823.

PMID: 39139944 PMC: 11317748. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4224.


Supercritical Extraction Techniques for Obtaining Biologically Active Substances from a Variety of Plant Byproducts.

Herzyk F, Pilakowska-Pietras D, Korzeniowska M Foods. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38890941 PMC: 11171758. DOI: 10.3390/foods13111713.


References
1.
Martin L, Rose J . There's more than one way to skin a fruit: formation and functions of fruit cuticles. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65(16):4639-51. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru301. View

2.
Szilagyi A, Bodor A, Tolvai N, Kovacs K, Bodai L, Wirth R . A comparative analysis of biogas production from tomato bio-waste in mesophilic batch and continuous anaerobic digestion systems. PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0248654. PMC: 7968646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248654. View

3.
Manrich A, Moreira F, Otoni C, Lorevice M, Martins M, Mattoso L . Hydrophobic edible films made up of tomato cutin and pectin. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 164:83-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.075. View

4.
Morales-Contreras B, Carlos Contreras-Esquivel J, Wicker L, Ochoa-Martinez L, Morales-Castro J . Husk Tomato (Physalis ixocarpa Brot.) Waste as a Promising Source of Pectin: Extraction and Physicochemical Characterization. J Food Sci. 2017; 82(7):1594-1601. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13768. View

5.
Luengo E, Alvarez I, Raso J . Improving carotenoid extraction from tomato waste by pulsed electric fields. Front Nutr. 2015; 1:12. PMC: 4428368. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00012. View