» Articles » PMID: 36552135

Development and Evaluation of Automated Tools for Auditory-Brainstem and Middle-Auditory Evoked Potentials Waves Detection and Annotation

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Dec 23
PMID 36552135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) are brain-derived electrical signals, following an auditory stimulus, utilised to examine any obstructions along the brain neural-pathways and to diagnose hearing impairment. The clinical evaluation of AEPs is based on the measurements of the latencies and amplitudes of waves of interest; hence, their identification is a prerequisite for AEP analysis. This process has proven to be complex, as it requires relevant clinical experience, and the existing software for this purpose has little practical use. The aim of this study was the development of two automated annotation tools for ABR (auditory brainstem response)- and AMLR (auditory middle latency response)-tests. After the acquisition of 1046 raw waveforms, appropriate pre-processing and implementation of a four-stage development process were performed, to define the appropriate logical conditions and steps for each algorithm. The tools' detection and annotation results, regarding the waves of interest, were then compared to the clinicians' manual annotation, achieving match rates of at least 93.86%, 98.51%, and 91.51% respectively, for the three ABR-waves of interest, and 93.21%, 92.25%, 83.35%, and 79.27%, respectively, for the four AMLR-waves. The application of such tools in AEP analysis is expected to assist towards an easier interpretation of these signals.

Citing Articles

Electrophysiological Variations in Auditory Potentials in Chronic Tinnitus Individuals: Treatment Response and Tinnitus Laterality.

Manta O, Kikidis D, Schlee W, Langguth B, Mazurek B, Lopez-Escamez J J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941430 PMC: 11818601. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030760.


Musical training does not enhance neural sound encoding at early stages of the auditory system: A large-scale multisite investigation.

Whiteford K, Baltzell L, Chiu M, Cooper J, Faucher S, Goh P bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282463 PMC: 11398345. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.02.610856.


Phenotypic spectrum of tinnitus patients bearing rare ANK2 gene variants.

Martin-Lagos J, Bernal-Robledano A, Perez-Carpena P, Lamolda M, Escalera-Balsera A, Frejo L Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(8):4071-4080.

PMID: 38507076 PMC: 11266272. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08561-9.


Universal Recommendations on Planning and Performing the Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) with a Focus on Mice and Rats.

Domarecka E, Szczepek A Audiol Res. 2023; 13(3):441-458.

PMID: 37366685 PMC: 10295129. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13030039.


Development of Machine-Learning Models for Tinnitus-Related Distress Classification Using Wavelet-Transformed Auditory Evoked Potential Signals and Clinical Data.

Manta O, Sarafidis M, Schlee W, Mazurek B, Matsopoulos G, Koutsouris D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37298037 PMC: 10253417. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113843.

References
1.
Picton T, Hunt M, Mowrey R, Rodriguez R, Maru J . Evaluation of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials using dynamic time warping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988; 71(3):212-25. DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90006-8. View

2.
Watson D . The effects of cochlear hearing loss, age and sex on the auditory brainstem response. Audiology. 1996; 35(5):246-58. DOI: 10.3109/00206099609071945. View

3.
Valderrama J, de la Torre A, Alvarez I, Segura J, Thornton A, Sainz M . Automatic quality assessment and peak identification of auditory brainstem responses with fitted parametric peaks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014; 114(3):262-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.02.015. View

4.
Picton T, John M, Purcell D, Plourde G . Human auditory steady-state responses: the effects of recording technique and state of arousal. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97(5):1396-1402. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082994.22466.DD. View

5.
Polonenko M, Maddox R . The Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response. Trends Hear. 2019; 23:2331216519871395. PMC: 6852359. DOI: 10.1177/2331216519871395. View