» Articles » PMID: 27904821

Auditory Brainstem Response and Late Latency Response in Individuals with Tinnitus Having Normal Hearing

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 2
PMID 27904821
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tinnitus is a commonly encountered complaint in routine audiology practice. The pathophysiology and exact generation site of tinnitus is not precisely established. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and late latency response (LLR) findings in individuals with tinnitus show mixed results in the literature. Majority of studies have focused on individuals having tinnitus with peripheral hearing loss. The present study explores ABR and LLR characteristics among tinnitus patients with normal audiometric presentation; with no direct indication of any cochlear lesion. This study aims at characterizing the ABR and LLR findings in individuals with tinnitus having normal audiometric presentation. ABR and LLR waveform characteristics were recorded and compared between participants with tinnitus (Group 1) and those without tinnitus (Group 2). The ABR analysis indicated no significant differences in latency and amplitude between Groups 1 and 2. However, patients with tinnitus showed abnormally reduced absolute amplitudes of peaks I and V. LLR analysis indicated no significant differences in latency and amplitude between Groups 1 and 2 except enhanced amplitude of P1. The reduced amplitude of peaks I and V along with normal absolute latencies of peaks I, III and V indicate that the origin of tinnitus is possibly due to reduced excitation of auditory nerve fibres arising from a peripheral hearing loss beyond 8 kHz. The P1 amplitude enhancement could be attributed to mechanism explaining central gain model; which suggests that central auditory structures recalibrates the mean firing rate, considering the reduced output from sensory structures, generating neural noise perceived as tinnitus.

Citing Articles

Auditory cortical functioning in individuals with misophonia: an electrophysiological investigation.

Aryal S, Prabhu P Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 281(5):2259-2273.

PMID: 37910210 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08318-w.


Development of Machine-Learning Models for Tinnitus-Related Distress Classification Using Wavelet-Transformed Auditory Evoked Potential Signals and Clinical Data.

Manta O, Sarafidis M, Schlee W, Mazurek B, Matsopoulos G, Koutsouris D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37298037 PMC: 10253417. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113843.


Comparative analysis of acoustic therapies for tinnitus treatment based on auditory event-related potentials.

Alonso-Valerdi L, Ibarra-Zarate D, Torres-Torres A, Zolezzi D, Naal-Ruiz N, Arguello-Garcia J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1059096.

PMID: 37081936 PMC: 10111057. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1059096.


Development and Evaluation of Automated Tools for Auditory-Brainstem and Middle-Auditory Evoked Potentials Waves Detection and Annotation.

Manta O, Sarafidis M, Vasileiou N, Schlee W, Consoulas C, Kikidis D Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552135 PMC: 9775187. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121675.


Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis.

Jacxsens L, De Pauw J, Cardon E, van der Wal A, Jacquemin L, Gilles A Front Neurol. 2022; 13:941876.

PMID: 36071905 PMC: 9441610. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.941876.


References
1.
Parra L, Pearlmutter B . Illusory percepts from auditory adaptation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(3):1632-41. DOI: 10.1121/1.2431346. View

2.
Robinson B, McAlpine D . Gain control mechanisms in the auditory pathway. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009; 19(4):402-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.07.006. View

3.
Willmore B, Cooke J, King A . Hearing in noisy environments: noise invariance and contrast gain control. J Physiol. 2014; 592(16):3371-81. PMC: 4229334. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.274886. View

4.
BUCHWALD J, Huang C . Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science. 1975; 189(4200):382-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1145206. View

5.
Schaette R, McAlpine D . Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(38):13452-7. PMC: 6623281. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011. View