» Articles » PMID: 36468424

Evaluation of Postcontrast Images of Intracranial Tumors at 7T and 3T MRI: An Intra-individual Comparison Study

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2022 Dec 5
PMID 36468424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for brain tumors in clinical practice.

Methods: Thirty patients with brain tumors underwent 7- and 3-T MRI. The performance and diagnostic confidence of 7- and 3-T MRI in the visualization of tumor details such as internal structure and feeding artery were evaluated by radiologists. Contrast-enhanced region performance and tumor detail diagnostic confidence score (DCS) were calculated and compared between 7 and 3T using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: In 19 with obvious enhancement and 11 cases without obvious enhancement, 7- and 3-T MRI showed similar performance. The tumors' internal structure and feeding artery were more clearly depicted by 7-T MRI (62.2% and 54.4%, respectively) than by 3-T MRI (2.2% and 6.7%, respectively). Furthermore, the mean DCSs of both internal structure and feeding artery were higher at 7T than at 3T (internal structure: 16.29 ± 9.67 vs. -5.79 ± 4.12, p = 0.028; feeding artery: 21.96 ± 6.93 vs. 4.46 ± 7.07, p = 0.028). The DCS was more significantly improved in the senior radiologist group.

Conclusion: Better visualization of brain tumor details and higher tumor detail diagnostic confidence can be obtained with 7-T MRI.

Citing Articles

Clinical 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: Impact and patient value in neurological disorders.

de Vries E, Hagbohm C, Ouellette R, Granberg T J Intern Med. 2025; 297(3):244-261.

PMID: 39775908 PMC: 11846079. DOI: 10.1111/joim.20059.


Metastatic brain tumors: from development to cutting-edge treatment.

Tanzhu G, Chen L, Ning J, Xue W, Wang C, Xiao G MedComm (2020). 2024; 6(1):e70020.

PMID: 39712454 PMC: 11661909. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70020.


Reproducibility and repeatability of quantitative T2 and T2* mapping of osteosarcomas in a mouse model.

Roudi R, Pisani L, Pisani F, Liang T, Daldrup-Link H Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):74.

PMID: 38872042 PMC: 11176138. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00467-9.


Advances in determining the gross tumor target volume for radiotherapy of brain metastases.

Du S, Gong G, Liu R, Meng K, Yin Y Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1338225.

PMID: 38779095 PMC: 11109437. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338225.


Neurosurgical robots in China: State of the art and future prospect.

Zhou S, Gao Y, Li R, Wang H, Zhang M, Guo Y iScience. 2023; 26(11):107983.

PMID: 37867956 PMC: 10589856. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107983.


References
1.
Stadlbauer A, Oberndorfer S, Zimmermann M, Renner B, Buchfelder M, Heinz G . Physiologic MR imaging of the tumor microenvironment revealed switching of metabolic phenotype upon recurrence of glioblastoma in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019; 40(3):528-538. PMC: 7026844. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X19827885. View

2.
Noebauer-Huhmann I, Szomolanyi P, Kronnerwetter C, Widhalm G, Weber M, Nemec S . Brain tumours at 7T MRI compared to 3T--contrast effect after half and full standard contrast agent dose: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2014; 25(1):106-12. PMC: 4363550. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3351-2. View

3.
Noebauer-Huhmann I, Szomolanyi P, Juras V, Kraff O, Ladd M, Trattnig S . Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents at 7 Tesla: in vitro T1 relaxivities in human blood plasma. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45(9):554-8. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ebd4e3. View

4.
Li Y, Larson P, Chen A, Lupo J, Ozhinsky E, Kelley D . Short-echo three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of patients with glioma at 7 Tesla for characterization of differences in metabolite levels. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 41(5):1332-41. PMC: 4269580. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24672. View

5.
Butte P, Mamelak A, Parrish-Novak J, Drazin D, Shweikeh F, Gangalum P . Near-infrared imaging of brain tumors using the Tumor Paint BLZ-100 to achieve near-complete resection of brain tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 36(2):E1. DOI: 10.3171/2013.11.FOCUS13497. View