» Articles » PMID: 36454788

ECPPF (E2F1, CCNA2, POLE, PPP2R1A, FBXW7) Stratification: Profiling High-risk Subtypes of Histomorphologically Low-risk and Treatment-insensitive Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer

Abstract

In endometrial cancer, occult high-risk subtypes (rooted in histomorphologically low-risk disease) with insensitivity to adjuvant therapies impede improvements in therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the ability of molecular high-risk (MHR) and low-risk (MLR) ECPPF (E2F1, CCNA2, POLE, PPP2R1A, FBXW7) stratification to profile recurrence in early, low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and insensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) in high-risk EEC. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas endometrial cancer database, we identified 192 EEC cases with available DNA sequencing and RNA expression data. Molecular parameters were integrated with clinicopathologic risk factors and adverse surveillance events. MHR was defined as high (-H) CCNA2 or E2F1 log2 expression (≥2.75), PPP2R1A mutations (-mu), or FBXW7mu; MLR was defined as low (-L) CCNA2 and E2F1 log2 expression (<2.75). We assessed 164 cases, plus another 28 with POLEmu for favorable-outcomes comparisons. MHR and MLR had significantly different progression-free survival (PFS) rates (P < .001), independent of traditional risk factors (eg, TP53mu), except for stage IV disease. PFS of CCNA2-L/E2F1-L paralleled that of POLEmu. ECPPF status stratified responses to adjuvant therapy in stage III-IV EEC (P < .01) and profiled stage I, grade 1-2 cases with risk of recurrence (P < .001). MHR was associated with CTNNB1mu-linked treatment failures (P < .001). Expression of homologous recombination repair (HR) and cell cycle genes was significantly elevated in CCNA2-H/E2F1-H compared with CCNA2-L/E2F1-L (P<1.0E-10), suggesting that HR deficiencies may underlie the favorable PFS in MLR. HRmu were detected in 20.7%. No treatment failures were observed in high-grade or advanced EEC with HRmu (P = .02). Favorable PFS in clinically high-risk EEC was associated with HRmu and MLR ECPPF (P < .001). In summary, MLR ECPPF and HRmu were associated with therapeutic efficacy in EEC. MHR ECPPF was associated with low-risk, early-stage recurrences and insensitivity to adjuvant therapies.

Citing Articles

Prognostic stratification of endometrial cancers with high microsatellite instability or no specific molecular profile.

Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Weroha S, Bakkum-Gamez J, Weaver A, McGree M, Dowdy S Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1105504.

PMID: 37287928 PMC: 10242089. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1105504.

References
1.
Ashley C, Da Cruz Paula A, Kumar R, Mandelker D, Pei X, Riaz N . Analysis of mutational signatures in primary and metastatic endometrial cancer reveals distinct patterns of DNA repair defects and shifts during tumor progression. Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 152(1):11-19. PMC: 6726428. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.032. View

2.
Randall M, Filiaci V, Muss H, Spirtos N, Mannel R, Fowler J . Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 24(1):36-44. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7617. View

3.
Plati J, Bucur O, Khosravi-Far R . Dysregulation of apoptotic signaling in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Biochem. 2008; 104(4):1124-49. PMC: 2941905. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.21707. View

4.
Cremona C, Sancho R, Diefenbacher M, Behrens A . Fbw7 and its counteracting forces in stem cells and cancer: Oncoproteins in the balance. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015; 36:52-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.09.006. View

5.
. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011; 474(7353):609-15. PMC: 3163504. DOI: 10.1038/nature10166. View