Seminal and Vagino-uterine Microbiome and Their Individual and Interactive Effects on Cattle Fertility

Overview

Journal Front Microbiol

Specialty Microbiology

Date 2022 Nov 25

PMID 36425035

Authors

Sarah M Luecke

Emily M Webb

Carl R Dahlen

Lawrence P Reynolds

Samat Amat

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Reproductive failure is a major economical drain on cow-calf operations across the globe. It can occur in both males and females and stem from prenatal and postnatal influences. Therefore, the cattle industry has been making efforts to improve fertility and the pregnancy rate in cattle herds as an attempt to maintain sustainability and profitability of cattle production. Despite the advancements made in genetic selection, nutrition, and the implementation of various reproductive technologies, fertility rates have not significantly improved in the past 50 years. This signifies a missing factor or factors in current reproductive management practices that influence successful fertilization and pregnancy. Emerging lines of evidence derived from human and other animals including cattle suggest that the microbial continuum along the male and female reproductive tracts are associated with male and female fertility-that is, fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy success-highlighting the potential for harnessing the male and female reproductive microbiome to improve fertility in cattle. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the recent studies on the bovine seminal and vagino-uterine microbiome and discuss individual and interactive roles of these microbial communities in defining cattle fertility.

Citing Articles

Combined analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data reveals core vaginal bacteria across livestock species.

Jonas L, Youngs C, Schmitz-Esser S Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1524000.

PMID: 39996073 PMC: 11849051. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1524000.

Microbial Gatekeepers of Fertility in the Female Reproductive Microbiome of Cattle.

Adnane M, Chapwanya A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456706 PMC: 11507627. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252010923.

Effects of dietary restriction and one-carbon metabolite supplementation during the first 63 days of gestation on the maternal gut, vaginal, and blood microbiota in cattle.

Luecke S, Aryee G, Holman D, Schmidt K, King L, Crouse M Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):48.

PMID: 39210404 PMC: 11360793. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00335-2.

The microbiome effect on the female reproductive performance.

Zanella R, de Camargo J, Scariot C, Marques M Anim Reprod. 2024; 21(3):e20240063.

PMID: 39175996 PMC: 11340800. DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0063.

Characterization of bovine vaginal microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing: associations with host fertility, longevity, health, and production.

Brulin L, Ducrocq S, Even G, Sanchez M, Martel S, Merlin S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19277.

PMID: 39164272 PMC: 11336114. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69715-7.

References

Watkins A, Dias I, Tsuro H, Allen D, Emes R, Moreton J . Paternal diet programs offspring health through sperm- and seminal plasma-specific pathways in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(40):10064-10069. PMC: 6176621. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806333115. View

Wickware C, Johnson T, Koziol J . Composition and diversity of the preputial microbiota in healthy bulls. Theriogenology. 2019; 145:231-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.11.002. View

Pelzer E, Allan J, Cunningham K, Mengersen K, Allan J, Launchbury T . Microbial colonization of follicular fluid: alterations in cytokine expression and adverse assisted reproduction technology outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7):1799-812. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der108. View

Fuerst-Waltl B, Schwarzenbacher H, Perner C, Solkner J . Effects of age and environmental factors on semen production and semen quality of Austrian Simmental bulls. Anim Reprod Sci. 2005; 95(1-2):27-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.09.002. View

Wang Y, Xie Z . Exploring the role of gut microbiome in male reproduction. Andrology. 2021; 10(3):441-450. DOI: 10.1111/andr.13143. View

Butler S . Nutritional management to optimize fertility of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Animal. 2014; 8 Suppl 1:15-26. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114000834. View

Amat S, Dahlen C, Swanson K, Ward A, Reynolds L, Caton J . Bovine Animal Model for Studying the Maternal Microbiome, Microbial Colonization and Their Role in Offspring Development and Fetal Programming. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:854453. PMC: 8916045. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.854453. View

Haro C, Rangel-Zuniga O, Alcala-Diaz J, Gomez-Delgado F, Perez-Martinez P, Delgado-Lista J . Intestinal Microbiota Is Influenced by Gender and Body Mass Index. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0154090. PMC: 4881937. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154090. View

Osadchiy V, Mills J, Mayer E, Eleswarapu S . The Seminal Microbiome and Male Factor Infertility. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2021; 12(3):202-207. PMC: 7968069. DOI: 10.1007/s11930-020-00273-5. View

10.

Robertson S, Sharkey D . Seminal fluid and fertility in women. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(3):511-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1101. View

11.

Sarker G, Sun W, Rosenkranz D, Pelczar P, Opitz L, Efthymiou V . Maternal overnutrition programs hedonic and metabolic phenotypes across generations through sperm tsRNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(21):10547-10556. PMC: 6534971. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820810116. View

12.

Santos T, Bicalho R . Diversity and succession of bacterial communities in the uterine fluid of postpartum metritic, endometritic and healthy dairy cows. PLoS One. 2013; 7(12):e53048. PMC: 3531447. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053048. View

13.

Gupta S, Mortensen M, Schjorring S, Trivedi U, Vestergaard G, Stokholm J . Amplicon sequencing provides more accurate microbiome information in healthy children compared to culturing. Commun Biol. 2019; 2:291. PMC: 6683184. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0540-1. View

14.

Koedooder R, Singer M, Schoenmakers S, Savelkoul P, Morre S, de Jonge J . The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(6):1042-1054. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez065. View

15.

Alfano M, Ferrarese R, Locatelli I, Ventimiglia E, Ippolito S, Gallina P . Testicular microbiome in azoospermic men-first evidence of the impact of an altered microenvironment. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(7):1212-1217. PMC: 6012977. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey116. View

16.

Hyman R, Fukushima M, Jiang H, Fung E, Rand L, Johnson B . Diversity of the vaginal microbiome correlates with preterm birth. Reprod Sci. 2013; 21(1):32-40. PMC: 3857766. DOI: 10.1177/1933719113488838. View

17.

Moorey S, Biase F . Beef heifer fertility: importance of management practices and technological advancements. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020; 11:97. PMC: 7528292. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-020-00503-9. View

18.

Patangia D, Anthony Ryan C, Dempsey E, Ross R, Stanton C . Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health. Microbiologyopen. 2022; 11(1):e1260. PMC: 8756738. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1260. View

19.

Codagnone M, Spichak S, OMahony S, OLeary O, Clarke G, Stanton C . Programming Bugs: Microbiota and the Developmental Origins of Brain Health and Disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2018; 85(2):150-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.06.014. View

20.

Kubasova T, Davidova-Gerzova L, Merlot E, Medvecky M, Polansky O, Gardan-Salmon D . Housing Systems Influence Gut Microbiota Composition of Sows but Not of Their Piglets. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0170051. PMC: 5234784. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170051. View