» Articles » PMID: 37098918

Metataxonomic Analysis of the Uterine Microbiota Associated with Low Fertility in Dairy Cows Using Endometrial Tissues Prior to First Artificial Insemination

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Apr 26
PMID 37098918
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The deterioration in reproductive performance in association with low fertility leads to significant economic losses on dairy farms. The uterine microbiota has begun to attract attention as a possible cause of unexplained low fertility. We analyzed the uterine microbiota associated with fertility by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in dairy cows. First, the alpha (Chao1 and Shannon) and beta (unweighted and weighted UniFrac) diversities of 69 cows at four dairy farms that had passed the voluntary waiting period before the first artificial insemination (AI) were analyzed with respect to factors including farm, housing style, feeding management, parity, and AI frequency to conception. Significant differences were observed in the farm, housing style, and feeding management, except parity and AI frequency to conception. The other diversity metrics did not show significant differences in the tested factors. Similar results were obtained for the predicted functional profile. Next, the microbial diversity analysis of 31 cows at a single farm using weighted UniFrac distance matrices revealed a correlation with AI frequency to conception but not with parity. In correlation with AI frequency to conception, the predicted function profile appeared to be slightly modified and a single bacterial taxon, , was detected. The bacterial associations related to fertility were estimated. Considering these, the uterine microbiota in dairy cows can be varied depending on the farm management practices and may become one of the measures for low fertility. We examined the uterine microbiota associated with low fertility in dairy cows derived from four commercial farms via a metataxonomic approach using endometrial tissues prior to the first artificial insemination. The present study provided two new insights into the relevance of uterine microbiota with respect to fertility. First, the uterine microbiota varied depending on housing style and feeding management. Next, a subtle change was observed in functional profile analysis: a formation of uterine microbiota was detected to be different in correlation with fertility in one farm studied. Considering these insights, an examination system on bovine uterine microbiota is hopefully established based on continuous research on this topic.

Citing Articles

Inflammatory uterine microenvironment in long-term infertility repeat breeder cows compared with normal fertile cows.

Taru M, Katoh T, Koshimizu K, Kuribayashi S, Miura R, Hamano S Vet Anim Sci. 2024; 25:100369.

PMID: 38984268 PMC: 11231747. DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100369.

References
1.
Madureira A, Denis-Robichaud J, Guida T, Cerri R, Vasconcelos J . Association between genomic daughter pregnancy rates and reproductive parameters in Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2022; 105(6):5534-5543. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21766. View

2.
Ferreira S, Queiroz J, Oleastro M, Domingues F . Insights in the pathogenesis and resistance of Arcobacter: A review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015; 42(3):364-83. DOI: 10.3109/1040841X.2014.954523. View

3.
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M . KEGG mapping tools for uncovering hidden features in biological data. Protein Sci. 2021; 31(1):47-53. PMC: 8740838. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4172. View

4.
Stangaferro M, Wijma R, Masello M, Thomas M, Giordano J . Extending the duration of the voluntary waiting period from 60 to 88 days in cows that received timed artificial insemination after the Double-Ovsynch protocol affected the reproductive performance, herd exit dynamics, and lactation performance of.... J Dairy Sci. 2017; 101(1):717-735. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13046. View

5.
Jeon S, Vieira-Neto A, Gobikrushanth M, Daetz R, Mingoti R, Parize A . Uterine Microbiota Progression from Calving until Establishment of Metritis in Dairy Cows. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81(18):6324-32. PMC: 4542247. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01753-15. View