» Articles » PMID: 33014361

Beef Heifer Fertility: Importance of Management Practices and Technological Advancements

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Oct 5
PMID 33014361
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of replacement heifers is at the core of cow-calf beef production systems. In 2020, the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service reported 5.771 million beef heifers, 500 pounds and over, are under development for cow replacement. A compilation of data from several studies indicate that between 85% and 95% of these heifers will become pregnant in their first breeding season. Several thousands of heifers being raised for replacement may not deliver a calf on their first breeding season and result in economic losses to cow-calf producers. Many management procedures have been developed to maximize the reproductive potential of beef heifers. Such approaches include, but are not limited to the following: nutritional management for controlled weight gain, identification of reproductive maturity by physiological and morphological indicators, and the implementation of an estrous synchronization program. The implementation of management strategies has important positive impact(s) on the reproductive efficiency of heifers. There are limitations, however, because some heifers deemed ready to enter their first breeding season do not become pregnant. In parallel, genetic selection for fertility-related traits in beef heifers have not promoted major genetic gains on this particular area, most likely due to low heritability of female fertility traits in cattle. Technologies such as antral follicle counting, DNA genotyping and RNA profiling are being investigated as a means to aid in the identification of heifers of low fertility potential. To date, many polymorphisms have been associated with heifer fertility, but no DNA markers have been identified across herds. Antral follicle count is an indication of the ovarian reserve and is an indicator of the reproductive health of a heifer. We have been working on the identification of transcriptome profiles in heifers associated with pregnancy outcome. Our current investigations integrating protein-coding transcript abundance and artificial intelligence have identified the potential for bloodborne transcript abundance to be used as indicators of fertility potential in beef heifers. In summary, there is an ongoing pressure for reducing costs and increasing efficiency in cow-calf production systems, and new technologies can help reduce the long-standing limitations in beef heifer fertility.

Citing Articles

Heritability Estimates of Age at First Calving and Correlation Analysis in Angus Cows Bred in Hungary.

Marton J, Bene S, Szabo F Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765619 PMC: 11672652. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243715.


Genome-wide association study identifies genomic regions associated with key reproductive traits in Korean Hanwoo cows.

Haque M, Lee Y, Ha J, Jin S, Park B, Kim N BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):496.

PMID: 38778305 PMC: 11112828. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10401-3.


Effects of Trace Mineral Injections on Measures of Growth and Trace Mineral Status of Primiparous Cows and their Calves.

Hernandez G, Ferreira M, Santos A, Bohnert D, Ranches J Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txae068.

PMID: 38774510 PMC: 11107845. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae068.


Higher abundance of 2-dehydro-d-gluconate in the plasma of sub-fertile or infertile Bos taurus heifers.

Marrella M, Moorey S, Campagna S, Sarumi Q, Biase F J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 38720650 PMC: 11247527. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae126.


Identification of quantitative trait loci and associated candidate genes for pregnancy success in Angus-Brahman crossbred heifers.

Hoorn Q, Zayas G, Rodriguez E, Jensen L, Mateescu R, Hansen P J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023; 14(1):137.

PMID: 37932831 PMC: 10629031. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-023-00940-2.


References
1.
Mallory D, Nash J, Ellersieck M, Smith M, Patterson D . Comparison of long-term progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus before fixed-time artificial insemination in beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89(5):1358-65. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3694. View

2.
Funston R, Larson D . Heifer development systems: dry-lot feeding compared with grazing dormant winter forage. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89(5):1595-602. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3095. View

3.
MacNeil M, Dearborn D, Cundiff L, DINKEL C, Gregory K . Effects of inbreeding and heterosis in Hereford females on fertility, calf survival and preweaning growth. J Anim Sci. 1989; 67(4):895-901. DOI: 10.2527/jas1989.674895x. View

4.
Gonzalez-Padilla E, Ruiz R, LeFever D, Denham A, Wiltbank J . Puberty in beef heifers. III. Induction of fertile estrus. J Anim Sci. 1975; 40(6):1110-8. DOI: 10.2527/jas1975.4061110x. View

5.
Hawken R, Zhang Y, Fortes M, Collis E, Barris W, Corbet N . Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2011; 90(5):1398-410. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4410. View