» Articles » PMID: 36382058

Conditioned Taste Aversion to L-Amino Acid Taste Stimuli and Oral Transcriptional Changes to Type 1 Taste Receptors T1R1 and T1R3 on Chronic Exposure to L-Alanine Solution in Chickens

Overview
Journal J Poult Sci
Date 2022 Nov 16
PMID 36382058
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Elucidating taste sensing systems in chickens is an important step toward understanding poultry nutrition. Amino acid taste receptors, type 1 taste receptors 1 and 3 (T1R1 and T1R3, respectively), are expressed in chicken taste cells, and chicken T1R1/T1R3 is activated by L-alanine (L-Ala) and L-serine (L-Ser), but not by L-proline (L-Pro). However, it is not clear whether chickens have a gustatory perception of L-amino acids. Here, we found that chickens conditioned to avoid either L-Ala, L-Ser, or L-Pro solutions could successfully learn to avoid the corresponding L-amino acid solution in the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) test. Because CTA is a well-established learning paradigm generated specifically by pairing gustatory perception and gastrointestinal malaise, the present study suggests that chickens can sense L-amino acids by gustatory perception. In addition, we found that the expression of the and genes was significantly downregulated in response to chronic exposure to L-Ala solution, but not to acute oral stimulation. Taken together, the present study suggests that chickens have a gustatory perception of L-amino acids, and the expression of T1R1/T1R3 mRNAs in the oral cavity can be regulated by L-amino acid intake. Since chickens can detect L-Pro solutions, additional amino acid receptors, other than T1R1/T1R3, may be involved in L-amino acid taste detection in chickens.

Citing Articles

Potential for the development of aqueous extract as a phytogenic feed additive for poultry.

Dong Z, Liu Z, Xu Y, Tan B, Sun W, Ai Q Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1354040.

PMID: 38529273 PMC: 10961442. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354040.


The avian taste system.

Niknafs S, Navarro M, Schneider E, Roura E Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1235377.

PMID: 37745254 PMC: 10516129. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1235377.

References
1.
Yoshida Y, Kawabata F, Nishimura S, Tabata S . Overlapping distributions of mammalian types I, II, and III taste cell markers in chicken taste buds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021; 570:162-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.07.025. View

2.
Chen K, Yan J, Suo Y, Li J, Wang Q, Lv B . Nutritional status alters saccharin intake and sweet receptor mRNA expression in rat taste buds. Brain Res. 2010; 1325:53-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.026. View

3.
Kusuhara Y, Yoshida R, Ohkuri T, Yasumatsu K, Voigt A, Hubner S . Taste responses in mice lacking taste receptor subunit T1R1. J Physiol. 2013; 591(7):1967-85. PMC: 3624863. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.236604. View

4.
Roper S, Chaudhari N . Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017; 18(8):485-497. PMC: 5958546. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2017.68. View

5.
DeFazio R, Dvoryanchikov G, Maruyama Y, Kim J, Pereira E, Roper S . Separate populations of receptor cells and presynaptic cells in mouse taste buds. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(15):3971-80. PMC: 3712837. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0515-06.2006. View