» Articles » PMID: 16573824

Mouse Taste Cells with G Protein-coupled Taste Receptors Lack Voltage-gated Calcium Channels and SNAP-25

Overview
Journal BMC Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 Apr 1
PMID 16573824
Citations 130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Taste receptor cells are responsible for transducing chemical stimuli from the environment and relaying information to the nervous system. Bitter, sweet and umami stimuli utilize G-protein coupled receptors which activate the phospholipase C (PLC) signaling pathway in Type II taste cells. However, it is not known how these cells communicate with the nervous system. Previous studies have shown that the subset of taste cells that expresses the T2R bitter receptors lack voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, which are normally required for synaptic transmission at conventional synapses. Here we use two lines of transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) from two taste-specific promoters to examine Ca2+ signaling in subsets of Type II cells: T1R3-GFP mice were used to identify sweet- and umami-sensitive taste cells, while TRPM5-GFP mice were used to identify all cells that utilize the PLC signaling pathway for transduction. Voltage-gated Ca2+ currents were assessed with Ca2+ imaging and whole cell recording, while immunocytochemistry was used to detect expression of SNAP-25, a presynaptic SNARE protein that is associated with conventional synapses in taste cells.

Results: Depolarization with high K+ resulted in an increase in intracellular Ca2+ in a small subset of non-GFP labeled cells of both transgenic mouse lines. In contrast, no depolarization-evoked Ca2+ responses were observed in GFP-expressing taste cells of either genotype, but GFP-labeled cells responded to the PLC activator m-3M3FBS, suggesting that these cells were viable. Whole cell recording indicated that the GFP-labeled cells of both genotypes had small voltage-dependent Na+ and K+ currents, but no evidence of Ca2+ currents. A subset of non-GFP labeled taste cells exhibited large voltage-dependent Na+ and K+ currents and a high threshold voltage-gated Ca2+ current. Immunocytochemistry indicated that SNAP-25 was expressed in a separate population of taste cells from those expressing T1R3 or TRPM5. These data indicate that G protein-coupled taste receptors and conventional synaptic signaling mechanisms are expressed in separate populations of taste cells.

Conclusion: The taste receptor cells responsible for the transduction of bitter, sweet, and umami stimuli are unlikely to communicate with nerve fibers by using conventional chemical synapses.

Citing Articles

Nutrient Sensing by Lingual G-Protein-Coupled Taste Receptors.

Dutta Banik D, Medler K Methods Mol Biol. 2025; 2882:317-327.

PMID: 39992517 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4284-9_16.


H3K36 methylation regulates cell plasticity and regeneration in the intestinal epithelium.

Pashos A, Meyer A, Bussey-Sutton C, OConnor E, Coradin M, Coulombe M Nat Cell Biol. 2025; 27(2):202-217.

PMID: 39779942 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-024-01580-y.


Epitope Tagging with Genome Editing in Mice Reveals That the Proton Channel OTOP1 Is Apically Localized and Not Restricted to Type III "Sour" Taste Receptor Cells.

Kaplan J, Ye W, Kileen H, Liang Z, Tran A, Chi J J Neurosci. 2024; 45(6).

PMID: 39592233 PMC: 11800744. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1560-24.2024.


Sodium-dependent glucose co-transport proteins (SGLTs) are not involved in human glucose taste detection.

Palmer R, Nechiporenko A, Ilies M, Winnig M, Gravina S, Tiwari R PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313128.

PMID: 39556551 PMC: 11573166. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313128.


Deciphering Peripheral Taste Neuron Diversity: Using Genetic Identity to Bridge Taste Bud Innervation Patterns and Functional Responses.

Ohman L, Huang T, Unwin V, Singh A, Walters B, Whiddon Z J Neurosci. 2024; 44(46).

PMID: 39379155 PMC: 11561867. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0583-24.2024.


References
1.
Nelson G, Hoon M, Chandrashekar J, Zhang Y, Ryba N, Zuker C . Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell. 2001; 106(3):381-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00451-2. View

2.
Kinnamon J, Sherman T, Roper S . Ultrastructure of mouse vallate taste buds: III. Patterns of synaptic connectivity. J Comp Neurol. 1988; 270(1):1-10, 56-7. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902700102. View

3.
Leybaert L, Braet K, Vandamme W, Cabooter L, Martin P, Evans W . Connexin channels, connexin mimetic peptides and ATP release. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003; 10(4-6):251-7. DOI: 10.1080/cac.10.4-6.251.257. View

4.
Pumplin D, Yu C, Smith D . Light and dark cells of rat vallate taste buds are morphologically distinct cell types. J Comp Neurol. 1997; 378(3):389-410. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970217)378:3<389::aid-cne7>3.0.co;2-#. View

5.
Takeda M . An electron microscopic study on the innervation in the taste buds of the mouse circumvallate papillae. Arch Histol Jpn. 1976; 39(4):257-69. DOI: 10.1679/aohc1950.39.257. View