» Articles » PMID: 36365028

Development, Optimisation and Validation of a Novel Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for the Simultaneous Detection of Spp., and

Overview
Journal Pathogens
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36365028
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The enteric protozoan parasites spp., and are-to various extents-contributors to the burden of gastrointestinal illness in high-income countries. Detection of these pathogens by microscopy examination is challenging because of the limited sensitivity and need for specific staining procedures. We developed and optimised a new multiplex real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of spp., and in clinical (stool) samples. The diagnostic performance of the assay was evaluated against a large panel of well-characterised DNA samples positive for spp. ( = 126), ( = 132) and ( = 49). The specificity of the test was assessed against a DNA panel from other intestinal or phylogenetically related parasites ( = 105) and faecal DNA from individuals without clinical manifestations ( = 12). The assay exhibited a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.90-0.97 and a diagnostic specificity of 1. The limit of detection was estimated for (1 oocyst) and (5 × 10 cysts). The method allowed the detection of four species (, , and ) and five assemblages (A-E) without cross-reacting with other parasites belonging to the phyla Amoebozoa, Apicomplexa, Euglenozoa, Microsporidia, Nematoda and Platyhelminthes. This newly developed multiplex real-time PCR assay represents a novel alternative for the rapid and accurate detection of , and in clinical settings.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Use of Singleplex and Duplex CerTest VIASURE Real-Time PCR Assays to Detect Common Intestinal Protist Parasites.

Dashti A, Alonso H, Escolar-Minana C, Koster P, Bailo B, Carmena D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38337835 PMC: 10855428. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030319.

References
1.
Ryan U, Paparini A, Oskam C . New Technologies for Detection of Enteric Parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2017; 33(7):532-546. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.03.005. View

2.
Verweij J, Stensvold C . Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014; 27(2):371-418. PMC: 3993103. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00122-13. View

3.
Gray T, Kwan Y, Phan T, Robertson G, Cheong E, Gottlieb T . Dientamoeba fragilis: a family cluster of disease associated with marked peripheral eosinophilia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57(6):845-8. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit389. View

4.
Perry M, Corden S, Howe R . Evaluation of the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel and the Savyon Diagnostics Gastrointestinal Infection Panel for the detection of enteric pathogens in clinical samples. J Med Microbiol. 2014; 63(Pt 11):1419-1426. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.074773-0. View

5.
Argy N, Nourrisson C, Aboubacar A, Poirier P, Valot S, Laude A . Selecting a multiplex PCR panel for accurate molecular diagnosis of intestinal protists: a comparative study of Allplex (Seegene), G-DiaParaTrio (Diagenode), and RIDAGENE (R-Biopharm) assays and microscopic examination. Parasite. 2022; 29:5. PMC: 8826582. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2022003. View