» Articles » PMID: 16836745

Meta-DiSc: a Software for Meta-analysis of Test Accuracy Data

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2006 Jul 14
PMID 16836745
Citations 738
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of test accuracy studies are increasingly being recognised as central in guiding clinical practice. However, there is currently no dedicated and comprehensive software for meta-analysis of diagnostic data. In this article, we present Meta-DiSc, a Windows-based, user-friendly, freely available (for academic use) software that we have developed, piloted, and validated to perform diagnostic meta-analysis.

Results: Meta-DiSc a) allows exploration of heterogeneity, with a variety of statistics including chi-square, I-squared and Spearman correlation tests, b) implements meta-regression techniques to explore the relationships between study characteristics and accuracy estimates, c) performs statistical pooling of sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios using fixed and random effects models, both overall and in subgroups and d) produces high quality figures, including forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curves that can be exported for use in manuscripts for publication. All computational algorithms have been validated through comparison with different statistical tools and published meta-analyses. Meta-DiSc has a Graphical User Interface with roll-down menus, dialog boxes, and online help facilities.

Conclusion: Meta-DiSc is a comprehensive and dedicated test accuracy meta-analysis software. It has already been used and cited in several meta-analyses published in high-ranking journals. The software is publicly available at http://www.hrc.es/investigacion/metadisc_en.htm.

Citing Articles

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sahafi P, Sadeghi R, Askari E, Sahebkari A, Ghahraman M, Khadivi E Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941296 PMC: 11817158. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030366.


Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution melting curve analysis for discrimination of oncology-associated mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yu S, Cheng Y, Tang C, Liu Y J Int Med Res. 2025; 53(2):3000605241311133.

PMID: 39932301 PMC: 11816084. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241311133.


The Limits of Inductive Reasoning for Clinical Evidence Appraisal: A Simulation Study.

Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77047.

PMID: 39917115 PMC: 11799697. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77047.


The Immunoexpression and Prognostic Significance of Stem Cell Markers in Malignant Salivary Gland Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kalogirou E, Tosiou A, Vrachnos S, Zogopoulos V, Michalopoulos I, Tzanavari T Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39858584 PMC: 11764928. DOI: 10.3390/genes16010037.


Polymorphic Single-Nucleotide Variants in miRNA Genes and the Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer: Combined Evaluation by Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis, Thakkinstian's Algorithm and FPRP Criterium.

Liu Q, Archilla I, Lopez-Prades S, Torres F, Camps J, Cuatrecasas M Cancer Med. 2025; 14(2):e70621.

PMID: 39840720 PMC: 11751872. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70621.


References
1.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

2.
Lijmer J, Bossuyt P, Heisterkamp S . Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1525-37. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1185. View

3.
Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L . Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology. 2003; 226(1):24-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2261021292. View

4.
Reitsma J, Glas A, Rutjes A, Scholten R, Bossuyt P, Zwinderman A . Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(10):982-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022. View

5.
Gupta J, Chien P, Voit D, Clark T, Khan K . Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81(9):799-816. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.810902.x. View