How Good is a PCR Efficiency Estimate: Recommendations for Precise and Robust QPCR Efficiency Assessments

Overview

Journal Biomol Detect Quantif

Date 2016 Apr 15

PMID 27077029

Citations 212

Authors

David Svec

Ales Tichopad

Vendula Novosadova

Michael W Pfaffl

Mikael Kubista

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We have examined the imprecision in the estimation of PCR efficiency by means of standard curves based on strategic experimental design with large number of technical replicates. In particular, how robust this estimation is in terms of a commonly varying factors: the instrument used, the number of technical replicates performed and the effect of the volume transferred throughout the dilution series. We used six different qPCR instruments, we performed 1-16 qPCR replicates per concentration and we tested 2-10 μl volume of analyte transferred, respectively. We find that the estimated PCR efficiency varies significantly across different instruments. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we find the uncertainty in the PCR efficiency estimation may be as large as 42.5% (95% CI) if standard curve with only one qPCR replicate is used in 16 different plates. Based on our investigation we propose recommendations for the precise estimation of PCR efficiency: (1) one robust standard curve with at least 3-4 qPCR replicates at each concentration shall be generated, (2) the efficiency is instrument dependent, but reproducibly stable on one platform, and (3) using a larger volume when constructing serial dilution series reduces sampling error and enables calibration across a wider dynamic range.

Citing Articles

Plastic sex-trait modulation by differential gene expression according to social environment in male red deer.

Broggini C, Abril N, Membrillo A, de la Pena E, Carranza J BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):160.

PMID: 39966742 PMC: 11837354. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11326-1.

Performance and functional assessment of the Kimera P-IV point-of-care plasmonic qPCR prototype for ultra rapid pathogen detection of .

Hayes J, Lee S, Carnevale J, Shamir D, Bohbot M, Kirk A Epidemiol Infect. 2025; 153:e27.

PMID: 39881625 PMC: 11869076. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268825000081.

Quantification of Viable by Propidium Monoazide Real-Time PCR After Long-Term Storage of Peanut Products.

von Hertwig A, Pereira A, Amorim Neto D, Nascimento M Microorganisms. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39770842 PMC: 11679600. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122640.

The Standardization and Quantification of Nuclear Factor Kappa B p65 by Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Gnanaskandan Sr S, Karunakaran U, Srikanth P Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74715.

PMID: 39735124 PMC: 11682531. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74715.

Development of a triplex crystal digital RT-PCR for the detection of PHEV, PRV, and CSFV.

Shi K, Hu X, Yin Y, Shi Y, Pan Y, Long F Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1462880.

PMID: 39726583 PMC: 11669669. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1462880.

References

Peccoud J, Jacob C . Theoretical uncertainty of measurements using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Biophys J. 1996; 71(1):101-8. PMC: 1233461. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79205-6. View

Bar T, Kubista M, Tichopad A . Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 40(4):1395-406. PMC: 3287174. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr778. View

Kubista M, Andrade J, Bengtsson M, Forootan A, Jonak J, Lind K . The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med. 2006; 27(2-3):95-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007. View

Goll R, Olsen T, Cui G, Florholmen J . Evaluation of absolute quantitation by nonlinear regression in probe-based real-time PCR. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7:107. PMC: 1450306. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-107. View

Tichopad A, Dilger M, Schwarz G, Pfaffl M . Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(20):e122. PMC: 219490. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gng122. View

Alvarez M, Vila-Ortiz G, Salibe M, Podhajcer O, Pitossi F . Model based analysis of real-time PCR data from DNA binding dye protocols. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8:85. PMC: 1838433. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-85. View

Wittwer C, Herrmann M, Moss A, Rasmussen R . Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. Biotechniques. 1997; 22(1):130-1, 134-8. DOI: 10.2144/97221bi01. View

Svec D, Andersson D, Pekny M, Sjoback R, Kubista M, Stahlberg A . Direct cell lysis for single-cell gene expression profiling. Front Oncol. 2013; 3:274. PMC: 3819639. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00274. View

Murphy J, Bustin S . Reliability of real-time reverse-transcription PCR in clinical diagnostics: gold standard or substandard?. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009; 9(2):187-97. DOI: 10.1586/14737159.9.2.187. View

10.

Tichopad A, Bar T, Pecen L, Kitchen R, Kubista M, Pfaffl M . Quality control for quantitative PCR based on amplification compatibility test. Methods. 2010; 50(4):308-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.01.028. View

11.

Bengtsson M, Hemberg M, Rorsman P, Stahlberg A . Quantification of mRNA in single cells and modelling of RT-qPCR induced noise. BMC Mol Biol. 2008; 9:63. PMC: 2483285. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-9-63. View

12.

Stahlberg A, Aman P, Ridell B, Mostad P, Kubista M . Quantitative real-time PCR method for detection of B-lymphocyte monoclonality by comparison of kappa and lambda immunoglobulin light chain expression. Clin Chem. 2003; 49(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1373/49.1.51. View

13.

Boeuf P, Vigan-Womas I, Jublot D, Loizon S, Barale J, Akanmori B . CyProQuant-PCR: a real time RT-PCR technique for profiling human cytokines, based on external RNA standards, readily automatable for clinical use. BMC Immunol. 2005; 6:5. PMC: 555737. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2172-6-5. View

14.

Lavagnini I, Magno F . A statistical overview on univariate calibration, inverse regression, and detection limits: Application to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry technique. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2006; 26(1):1-18. DOI: 10.1002/mas.20100. View

15.

Nolan T, Hands R, Ogunkolade W, Bustin S . SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem. 2006; 351(2):308-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.051. View

16.

Pfaffl M . A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(9):e45. PMC: 55695. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. View

17.

Bustin S, Benes V, Garson J, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M . The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009; 55(4):611-22. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797. View

18.

Bustin S . Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000; 25(2):169-93. DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0250169. View

19.

Higuchi R, Dollinger G, Walsh P, Griffith R . Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Biotechnology (N Y). 1992; 10(4):413-7. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0492-413. View

20.

Lalam N . Estimation of the reaction efficiency in polymerase chain reaction. J Theor Biol. 2006; 242(4):947-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.001. View