» Articles » PMID: 36346687

Triple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine

Abstract

Purpose: Predictive biomarkers for capecitabine benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been recently proposed using samples from phase III clinical trials, including non-basal phenotype and biomarkers related to angiogenesis, stroma, and capecitabine activation genes. We aimed to validate these findings on the larger phase III GEICAM/CIBOMA clinical trial.

Experimental Design: Tumor tissues from patients with TNBC randomized to standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy followed by capecitabine versus observation were analyzed using a 164-gene NanoString custom nCounter codeset measuring mRNA expression. A prespecified statistical plan sought to verify the predictive capacity of PAM50 non-basal molecular subtype and tested the hypotheses that breast tumors with increased expression of (meta)genes for cytotoxic cells, mast cells, endothelial cells, PDL2, and 38 individual genes benefit from adjuvant capecitabine for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS; primary endpoint) and overall survival.

Results: Of the 876 women enrolled in the GEICAM/CIBOMA trial, 658 (75%) were evaluable for analysis (337 with capecitabine and 321 without). Of these cases, 553 (84%) were profiled as PAM50 basal-like whereas 105 (16%) were PAM50 non-basal. Non-basal subtype was the most significant predictor for capecitabine benefit [HRcapecitabine, 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07-0.54; P < 0.001] when compared with PAM50 basal-like (HRcapecitabine, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.63-1.28; P = 0.55; Pinteraction<0.001, adjusted P value = 0.01). Analysis of biological processes related to PAM50 non-basal subtype revealed its enrichment for mast cells, extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, and features of mesenchymal stem-like TNBC subtype.

Conclusions: In this prespecified correlative analysis of the GEICAM/CIBOMA trial, PAM50 non-basal status identified patients with early-stage TNBC most likely to benefit from capecitabine.

Citing Articles

Intrinsic subtype and immunity score in identification of triple-negative breast cancer at low risk.

Ren X, Zhou T, Song Y, Wu H, Chou J, Miller L Breast. 2025; 80:103889.

PMID: 39908962 PMC: 11847028. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.103889.


Classifications of triple-negative breast cancer: insights and current therapeutic approaches.

Chen Z, Liu Y, Lyu M, Chan C, Sun M, Yang X Cell Biosci. 2025; 15(1):13.

PMID: 39893480 PMC: 11787746. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-025-01359-0.


Unveiling the role of PANoptosis-related genes in breast cancer: an integrated study by multi-omics analysis and machine learning algorithms.

Liu G, Pan L, Chen J, Ma J Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025; .

PMID: 39870964 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07620-x.


A Phase I Trial of Alpelisib Combined With Capecitabine in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

File D, Abdou Y, Force J, Moore D, Anders C, Reeder-Hayes K Clin Breast Cancer. 2024; 24(8):683-690.

PMID: 39217059 PMC: 11840667. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.001.


Caveolin-1 gene expression provides additional prognostic information combined with PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) score in breast cancer.

Godina C, Belting M, Vallon-Christersson J, Isaksson K, Bosch A, Jernstrom H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6675.

PMID: 38509243 PMC: 10954762. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57365-8.


References
1.
Asleh K, Riaz N, Nielsen T . Heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer: Current advances in subtyping and treatment implications. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41(1):265. PMC: 9434975. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02476-1. View

2.
Perou C . Molecular stratification of triple-negative breast cancers. Oncologist. 2010; 15 Suppl 5:39-48. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S5-39. View

3.
OShaughnessy J, Koeppen H, Xiao Y, Lackner M, Paul D, Stokoe C . Patients with Slowly Proliferative Early Breast Cancer Have Low Five-Year Recurrence Rates in a Phase III Adjuvant Trial of Capecitabine. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(19):4305-11. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0636. View

4.
Yu J, Du W, Yan F, Wang Y, Li H, Cao S . Myeloid-derived suppressor cells suppress antitumor immune responses through IDO expression and correlate with lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer. J Immunol. 2013; 190(7):3783-97. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201449. View

5.
Simon R, Paik S, Hayes D . Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(21):1446-52. PMC: 2782246. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp335. View