Somatosensory Processing in Deaf and Deafblind Individuals: How Does the Brain Adapt As a Function of Sensory and Linguistic Experience? A Critical Review

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2022 Nov 3

PMID 36324786

Authors

Agnes Villwock

Konstantin Grin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

How do deaf and deafblind individuals process touch? This question offers a unique model to understand the prospects and constraints of neural plasticity. Our brain constantly receives and processes signals from the environment and combines them into the most reliable information content. The nervous system adapts its functional and structural organization according to the input, and perceptual processing develops as a function of individual experience. However, there are still many unresolved questions regarding the deciding factors for these changes in deaf and deafblind individuals, and so far, findings are not consistent. To date, most studies have not taken the sensory and linguistic experiences of the included participants into account. As a result, the impact of sensory deprivation vs. language experience on somatosensory processing remains inconclusive. Even less is known about the impact of deafblindness on brain development. The resulting neural adaptations could be even more substantial, but no clear patterns have yet been identified. How do deafblind individuals process sensory input? Studies on deafblindness have mostly focused on single cases or groups of late-blind individuals. Importantly, the language backgrounds of deafblind communities are highly variable and include the usage of tactile languages. So far, this kind of linguistic experience and its consequences have not been considered in studies on basic perceptual functions. Here, we will provide a critical review of the literature, aiming at identifying determinants for neuroplasticity and gaps in our current knowledge of somatosensory processing in deaf and deafblind individuals.

References

Neville H, Bavelier D, Corina D, Rauschecker J, Karni A, Lalwani A . Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(3):922-9. PMC: 33817. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.922. View

Land R, Baumhoff P, Tillein J, Lomber S, Hubka P, Kral A . Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(23):6175-85. PMC: 4899523. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0046-16.2016. View

Bavelier D, Brozinsky C, Tomann A, Mitchell T, Neville H, Liu G . Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(22):8931-42. PMC: 6762265. View

Bottari D, Caclin A, Giard M, Pavani F . Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e25607. PMC: 3183070. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025607. View

Emmorey K, Damasio H, McCullough S, Grabowski T, Ponto L, Hichwa R . Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):812-24. View

Villwock A, Wilkinson E, Pinar P, Morford J . Language development in deaf bilinguals: Deaf middle school students co-activate written English and American Sign Language during lexical processing. Cognition. 2021; 211:104642. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104642. View

Dormal G, Collignon O . Functional selectivity in sensory-deprived cortices. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105(6):2627-30. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00109.2011. View

Allman B, Keniston L, Meredith M . Adult deafness induces somatosensory conversion of ferret auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(14):5925-30. PMC: 2667075. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809483106. View

Van Dijk R, Kappers A, Postma A . Superior spatial touch: improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals. Exp Brain Res. 2013; 230(3):283-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3653-7. View

10.

Dye M, Hauser P . Sustained attention, selective attention and cognitive control in deaf and hearing children. Hear Res. 2013; 309:94-102. PMC: 3928356. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.001. View

11.

Welch R, Warren D . Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol Bull. 1980; 88(3):638-67. View

12.

Neville H, Lawson D . Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res. 1987; 405(2):268-83. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90296-4. View

13.

Papagno C, Cecchetto C, Pisoni A, Bolognini N . Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?. Exp Brain Res. 2015; 234(2):627-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4488-1. View

14.

Neville H, Lawson D . Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language. Brain Res. 1987; 405(2):284-94. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6. View

15.

Emmorey K, Bosworth R, Kraljic T . Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language. J Mem Lang. 2010; 61(3):398-411. PMC: 2747116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.001. View

16.

Scurry A, Chifamba K, Jiang F . Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual-Tactile Temporal Order Perception in Early Deaf Adults. Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:544472. PMC: 7539666. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.544472. View

17.

Shield A, Meier R . Learning an Embodied Visual Language: Four Imitation Strategies Available to Sign Learners. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:811. PMC: 5988899. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00811. View

18.

Mayberry R, Chen J, Witcher P, Klein D . Age of acquisition effects on the functional organization of language in the adult brain. Brain Lang. 2011; 119(1):16-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.007. View

19.

Kral A . Auditory critical periods: a review from system's perspective. Neuroscience. 2013; 247:117-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.05.021. View

20.

Merabet L, Pascual-Leone A . Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 11(1):44-52. PMC: 3898172. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2758. View