Quantitative Evaluation of Sensitive Skin by ANTERA 3D Combined with GPSkin Barrier

Overview

Journal Skin Res Technol

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2022 Oct 29

PMID 36308515

Authors

S Anqi

S Xiukun

X Aie

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: At present, there are many different evaluation methods for sensitive skin, including subjective, semisubjective, and objective evaluation. Various objective tests focus on assessing changes in barrier functions. It is anticipated that the ANTERA 3D®, in combination with GPSkin Barrier®, will provide better evaluation of sensitive skin.

Methods: A total of 20 subjects with sensitive skin and 20 healthy participants were recruited. Sensitive skin subjects were treated with an anti-sensitive moisturizing tolerance-extreme cream which has anti-inflammatory and moisturizing effects, twice daily on the whole face for 28 days. VISIA Skin Detector was used to record clinical images and red area. GPSkin Barrier was used to measure TEWL and SCH. Texture, hemoglobin, and influenced area (mm ) were recorded using ANTERA 3D . Subjects underwent skin tests and recorded changes at D0 and D28. Data were only collected from healthy participants who did not receive treatment as controls.

Results: TEWL, texture, hemoglobin, and affected area in sensitive skin group were significantly higher than those in healthy group, while SCH was significantly lower than that in healthy group (p all<0.05). After anti-inflammatory and moisturizing treatment, the texture, hemoglobin, and affected area of sensitive skin decreased, TEWL decreased while SCH increased (p all<0.05).

Conclusions: Based on the results, the combination of the ANTERA 3D with GPSkin Barrier could be used as a new kind of quantitative evaluation method for the detection and diagnosis of sensitive skin.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of tranexamic acid solution versus vitamin C solution after micro-needling in treatment of persistent post acne erythema: a split face clinical and 3DAntera camera comparative study.

Sharara M, Fawaz G, El Samahy M Arch Dermatol Res. 2024; 317(1):150.

PMID: 39708096 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-03582-0.

A smartphone application for personalized facial aesthetic monitoring.

Hashimoto W, Kaneda S Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(7):e13824.

PMID: 38978223 PMC: 11230921. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13824.

New Regenerative and Anti-Aging Medicine Approach Based on Single-Stranded Alpha-1 Collagen for Neo-Collagenesis Induction: Clinical and Instrumental Experience of a New Injective Polycomponent Formulation for Dermal Regeneration.

Di Rosa L, De Pasquale A, Baldassano S, Marguglio N, Drid P, Proia P Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672270 PMC: 11048055. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040916.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of 'ULTRACOL 200' in enhancing nasolabial fold wrinkles through cutaneous repair.

Giang N, Kim H, Chien P, Kwon H, Ham J, Lee W Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(4):e13679.

PMID: 38616503 PMC: 11016812. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13679.

Skin rejuvenation and photoaging protection using adipose-derived stem cell extracellular vesicles loaded with exogenous cargos.

Nguyen D, Vu D, Vo N, Tran N, Ho D, Nguyen T Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(2):e13599.

PMID: 38279569 PMC: 10818134. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13599.

References

Yatagai T, Shimauchi T, Yamaguchi H, Sakabe J, Aoshima M, Ikeya S . Sensitive skin is highly frequent in extrinsic atopic dermatitis and correlates with disease severity markers but not necessarily with skin barrier impairment. J Dermatol Sci. 2017; 89(1):33-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.10.011. View

Richters R, Falcone D, Uzunbajakava N, Varghese B, Caspers P, Puppels G . Sensitive Skin: Assessment of the Skin Barrier Using Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2017; 30(1):1-12. PMC: 5516410. DOI: 10.1159/000452152. View

Ruccia F, Zoccali G, Cooper L, Rosten C, Nduka C . A three-dimensional scar assessment tool for keloid scars: Volume, erythema and melanin quantified. Skin Res Technol. 2021; 27(6):1007-1016. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13050. View

Araco A, Araco F . Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41(7):NP866-NP874. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab125. View

Wollenberg A, Gimenez-Arnau A . Sensitive skin: A relevant syndrome, be aware. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022; 36 Suppl 5:3-5. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17903. View

Misery L, Weisshaar E, Brenaut E, Evers A, Huet F, Stander S . Pathophysiology and management of sensitive skin: position paper from the special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019; 34(2):222-229. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16000. View

Farage M . The Prevalence of Sensitive Skin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019; 6:98. PMC: 6533878. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00098. View

Zheng Y, Liang H, Li Z, Tang M, Song L . Skin microbiome in sensitive skin: The decrease of Staphylococcus epidermidis seems to be related to female lactic acid sting test sensitive skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2020; 97(3):225-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.12.004. View

Jiang W, Zhang H, Xu Y, Jiang C, Xu Y, Liu W . Cutaneous vessel features of sensitive skin and its underlying functions. Skin Res Technol. 2019; 26(3):431-437. PMC: 7317501. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12819. View

10.

Misery L, Loser K, Stander S . Sensitive skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016; 30 Suppl 1:2-8. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13532. View

11.

Matias A, Ferreira M, Costa P, Neto P . Skin colour, skin redness and melanin biometric measurements: comparison study between Antera(®) 3D, Mexameter(®) and Colorimeter(®). Skin Res Technol. 2015; 21(3):346-62. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12199. View

12.

Segot-Chicq E, Salah S, Jullien M, Portal N, Deschodt C, Gagnebien D . Defining and validating a Body Skin Discomfort Index (BSDI). Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018; 40(5):488-493. DOI: 10.1111/ics.12490. View

13.

Grinich E, Topham C, Haynes D, Chung J, Latour E, Simpson E . Validation of a novel patient-operated device for measuring skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis. Skin Res Technol. 2021; 27(5):824-830. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13027. View

14.

Kim Y, Cheon H, Misery L, Taieb C, Lee Y . Sensitive skin in Korean population: An epidemiological approach. Skin Res Technol. 2017; 24(2):229-234. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12418. View

15.

Linming F, Wei H, Anqi L, Yuanyu C, Heng X, Sushmita P . Comparison of two skin imaging analysis instruments: The VISIA from Canfield vs the ANTERA 3D CS from Miravex. Skin Res Technol. 2017; 24(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12381. View

16.

Finlay A, Khan G . Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994; 19(3):210-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x. View

17.

Kandil S, Soliman I, Diab H, Bedair N, Mahrous M, Abdou E . Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate vesicular carriers for topical delivery; preparation, in-vitro and ex-vivo evaluation, factorial optimization and clinical assessment in melasma patients. Drug Deliv. 2022; 29(1):534-547. PMC: 9040897. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2036872. View

18.

Misery L, Jean-Decoster C, Mery S, Georgescu V, Sibaud V . A new ten-item questionnaire for assessing sensitive skin: the Sensitive Scale-10. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014; 94(6):635-9. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1870. View

19.

Polena H, Chavagnac-Bonneville M, Misery L, Sayag M . Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) Questionnaire and Current Perception Threshold: Use as Diagnostic Tools for Sensitive Skin Syndrome. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021; 101(11):adv00606. PMC: 9455310. DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v101.365. View

20.

Do L, Azizi N, Maibach H . Sensitive Skin Syndrome: An Update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019; 21(3):401-409. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-019-00499-7. View