» Articles » PMID: 34648037

Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) Questionnaire and Current Perception Threshold: Use As Diagnostic Tools for Sensitive Skin Syndrome

Overview
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2021 Oct 14
PMID 34648037
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The assessment of sensitive skin syndrome, characterized by subjective unpleasant sensations, remains a challenge, since there is no international consensus on the best diagnostic tools. This study evaluated the combination of the Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) questionnaire and the current perception threshold as diagnostic tools for sensitive skin syndrome, and the relationship between BoSS and the subjects' smoking status, phototype and skin type. A total of 100 women completed the BoSS questionnaire, and current perception threshold was measured on the face. The BoSS score was significantly higher in the self-reported sensitive skin group compared with the non-sensitive skin group (25.61 vs 14.05; p < 0.001), and in non-smokers vs smokers (23.00 vs 18.37; p < 0.05). In addition, the current perception threshold values were similar between the sensitive and non-sensitive groups. These results suggest that BoSS is a better diagnostic tool for sensitive skin syndrome than the current perception threshold, and that smokers less frequently have sensitive skin than do non-smokers.

Citing Articles

Future challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for sustainable safety in the Republic of Korea's skin care market: a systematic review.

Lee J, Kwon K Mhealth. 2024; 10:33.

PMID: 39534454 PMC: 11557158. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-61.


From consistent subjective assessment of skin sensitivity severity to its accurate objective scoring.

Rengot J, Meyer I, Chevrot N, Maire M, Cherel M, Prestat-Marquis E Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30(3):e13635.

PMID: 38500364 PMC: 10948949. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13635.


Cowhage-induced itch scores and the current perception threshold in assessing sensitive skin: An observational laboratory study.

Zuo Y, Wan R, Jiang P, Chen X, Li L, Hua W Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(6):e13387.

PMID: 37357643 PMC: 10242191. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13387.


Quantitative evaluation of sensitive skin by ANTERA 3D combined with GPSkin Barrier.

Anqi S, Xiukun S, Aie X Skin Res Technol. 2022; 28(6):840-845.

PMID: 36308515 PMC: 9907598. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13213.

References
1.
Misery L, Rahhali N, Ambonati M, Black D, Saint-Martory C, Schmitt A . Evaluation of sensitive scalp severity and symptomatology by using a new score. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011; 25(11):1295-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03968.x. View

2.
Misery L, Jourdan E, Abadie S, Ezzedine K, Brenaut E, Huet F . Development and validation of a new tool to assess the Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32(12):2217-2223. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15186. View

3.
Misery L, Loser K, Stander S . Sensitive skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016; 30 Suppl 1:2-8. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13532. View

4.
Talagas M, Misery L . Role of Keratinocytes in Sensitive Skin. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019; 6:108. PMC: 6536610. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00108. View

5.
Putz Z, Tabak A, Toth N, Istenes I, Nemeth N, Gandhi R . Noninvasive evaluation of neural impairment in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2008; 32(1):181-3. PMC: 2606810. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1406. View