» Articles » PMID: 36254494

The Economic Costs of a Multisectoral Nutrition Programme Implemented Through a Credit Platform in Bangladesh

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bangladesh struggles with undernutrition in women and young children. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programmes can help address rural undernutrition. However, questions remain on the costs of multisectoral programmes. This study estimates the economic costs of the Targeting and Re-aligning Agriculture to Improve Nutrition (TRAIN) programme, which integrated nutrition behaviour change and agricultural extension with a credit platform to support women's income generation. We used the Strengthening Economic Evaluation for Multisectoral Strategies for Nutrition (SEEMS-Nutrition) approach. The approach aligns costs with a multisectoral nutrition typology, identifying inputs and costs along programme impact pathways. We measure and allocate costs for activities and inputs, combining expenditures and micro-costing. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected retrospectively from implementers and beneficiaries. Expenditure data and economic costs were combined to calculate incremental economic costs. The intervention was designed around a randomised control trial. Incremental costs are presented by treatment arm. The total incremental cost was $795,040.34 for a 3.5-year period. The annual incremental costs per household were US$65.37 (Arm 2), USD$114.15 (Arm 3) and $157.11 (Arm 4). Total costs were led by nutrition counselling (37%), agriculture extension (12%), supervision (12%), training (12%), monitoring and evaluation (9%) and community events (5%). Total input costs were led by personnel (68%), travel (12%) and supplies (7%). This study presents the total incremental costs of an agriculture-nutrition intervention implemented through a microcredit platform. Costs per household compare favourably with similar interventions. Our results illustrate the value of a standardised costing approach for comparison with other multisectoral nutrition interventions.

Citing Articles

The economic costs of a multisectoral nutrition programme implemented through a credit platform in Bangladesh.

Thai G, Margolies A, Gelli A, Sultana N, Choo E, Kumar N Matern Child Nutr. 2022; 19(1):e13441.

PMID: 36254494 PMC: 9749601. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13441.

References
1.
Ruel M, Alderman H . Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?. Lancet. 2013; 382(9891):536-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0. View

2.
Malapit H, Quisumbing A, Meinzen-Dick R, Seymour G, Martinez E, Heckert J . Development of the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI). World Dev. 2019; 122:675-692. PMC: 6694750. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.018. View

3.
Gyles C, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I, Carlberg J, Senanayake V, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I, Poley M . Health economics and nutrition: a review of published evidence. Nutr Rev. 2012; 70(12):693-708. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00514.x. View

4.
Brooker S, Kabatereine N, Fleming F, Devlin N . Cost and cost-effectiveness of nationwide school-based helminth control in Uganda: intra-country variation and effects of scaling-up. Health Policy Plan. 2007; 23(1):24-35. PMC: 2637386. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czm041. View

5.
Dodd S, Bassi A, Bodger K, Williamson P . A comparison of multivariable regression models to analyse cost data. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12(1):76-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00610.x. View