» Articles » PMID: 36251990

Aesthetic Experience Enhances First-person Spatial Representation

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Oct 17
PMID 36251990
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Episodic autobiographical memories are characterized by a spatial context and an affective component. But how do affective and spatial aspects interact? Does affect modulate the way we encode the spatial context of events? We investigated how one element of affect, namely aesthetic liking, modulates memory for location, in three online experiments ( = 124, 79, and 80). Participants visited a professionally curated virtual art exhibition. They then relocated previously viewed artworks on the museum map and reported how much they liked them. Across all experiments, liking an artwork was associated with increased ability to recall the wall on which it was hung. The effect was not explained by viewing time and appeared to modulate recognition speed. The liking-wall memory effect remained when participants attended to abstractness, rather than liking, and when testing occurred 24 h after the museum visit. Liking also modulated memory for the room where a work of art was hung, but this effect primarily involved reduced room memory for disliked artworks. Further, the liking-wall memory effect remained after controlling for effects of room memory. Recalling the wall requires recalling one's facing direction, so our findings suggest that positive aesthetic experiences enhance first-person spatial representations. More generally, a first-person component of positive affect transfers to wider spatial representation and facilitates the encoding of locations in a subject-centered reference frame. Affect and spatial representations are therefore important, and linked, elements of sentience and subjectivity. Memories of aesthetic experiences are also spatial memories of how we encountered a work of art. This linkage may have implications for museum design.

Citing Articles

Self-reference and emotional reaction drive aesthetic judgment.

Salgues S, Jacquot A, Makowski D, Tahar C, Baekeland J, Arcangeli M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19699.

PMID: 39181906 PMC: 11344806. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68331-9.


Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Memory for Body Parts: A Virtual Reality Study.

Serino S, Di Lernia D, Magni G, Manenti P, De Gasperi S, Riva G J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):33.

PMID: 38638460 PMC: 11025578. DOI: 10.5334/joc.357.


Aesthetic experience enhances first-person spatial representation.

Babo-Rebelo M, Chatel M, Tabacchi S, Namiq A, Travers E, James K Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(43):e2201540119.

PMID: 36251990 PMC: 9618070. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201540119.

References
1.
Brieber D, Nadal M, Leder H, Rosenberg R . Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99019. PMC: 4043844. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099019. View

2.
Marchette S, Ryan J, Epstein R . Schematic representations of local environmental space guide goal-directed navigation. Cognition. 2016; 158:68-80. PMC: 5123926. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.005. View

3.
Butler W, Hardcastle K, Giocomo L . Remembered reward locations restructure entorhinal spatial maps. Science. 2019; 363(6434):1447-1452. PMC: 6516752. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav5297. View

4.
Manns J, Eichenbaum H . A cognitive map for object memory in the hippocampus. Learn Mem. 2009; 16(10):616-24. PMC: 2769165. DOI: 10.1101/lm.1484509. View

5.
St Jacques P, Szpunar K, Schacter D . Shifting visual perspective during retrieval shapes autobiographical memories. Neuroimage. 2016; 148:103-114. PMC: 5344759. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.028. View