Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation Between Art Experience and Viewing Time

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2014 Jun 4

PMID 24892829

Citations 56

Authors

David Brieber

Marcos Nadal

Helmut Leder

Raphael Rosenberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The experience of art emerges from the interaction of various cognitive and affective processes. The unfolding of these processes in time and their relation with viewing behavior, however, is still poorly understood. Here we examined the effect of context on the relation between the experience of art and viewing time, the most basic indicator of viewing behavior. Two groups of participants viewed an art exhibition in one of two contexts: one in the museum, the other in the laboratory. In both cases viewing time was recorded with a mobile eye tracking system. After freely viewing the exhibition, participants rated each artwork on liking, interest, understanding, and ambiguity scales. Our results show that participants in the museum context liked artworks more, found them more interesting, and viewed them longer than those in the laboratory. Analyses with mixed effects models revealed that aesthetic appreciation (compounding liking and interest), understanding, and ambiguity predicted viewing time for artworks and for their corresponding labels. The effect of aesthetic appreciation and ambiguity on viewing time was modulated by context: Whereas art appreciation tended to predict viewing time better in the laboratory than in museum context, the relation between ambiguity and viewing time was positive in the museum and negative in the laboratory context. Our results suggest that art museums foster an enduring and focused aesthetic experience and demonstrate that context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing behavior.

Citing Articles

A comparison of art engagement in museums and through digital media.

Darda K, Estrada Gonzalez V, Christensen A, Bobrow I, Krimm A, Nasim Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8972.

PMID: 40089606 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93630-0.

The fundamentals of eye tracking part 2: From research question to operationalization.

Hooge I, Nuthmann A, Nystrom M, Niehorster D, Holleman G, Andersson R Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):73.

PMID: 39856471 PMC: 11761893. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02590-2.

How does contextual information affect aesthetic appreciation and gaze behavior in figurative and abstract artwork?.

Casteau S, Smith D J Vis. 2024; 24(12):8.

PMID: 39514204 PMC: 11552055. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.12.8.

Age-adapted painting descriptions change the viewing behavior of young visitors to the Rijksmuseum.

Walker F, Bucker B, Snell J, Anderson N, Pilz Z, Houwaart K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22880.

PMID: 39384845 PMC: 11464813. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73963-y.

The role of audiovisual congruence in aesthetic appreciation of contemporary music and visual art.

Fink L, Fiehn H, Wald-Fuhrmann M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20923.

PMID: 39251764 PMC: 11384752. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71399-y.

References

Smets G . Pleasingness vs interestingness of visual stimuli with controlled complexity: their relationship to looking time as a function of exposure time. Percept Mot Skills. 1975; 40(1):3-7. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.3. View

Kirk U, Skov M, Christensen M, Nygaard N . Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 2008; 69(2):306-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.004. View

Henderson J, Hollingworth A . High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999; 50:243-71. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243. View

Leckart B, Bakan P . Complexity judgments of photographs and looking time. Percept Mot Skills. 1965; 21(1):16-8. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1965.21.1.16. View

Cupchik G, Vartanian O, Crawley A, Mikulis D . Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cogn. 2009; 70(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003. View

Newman G, Bloom P . Art and authenticity: the importance of originals in judgments of value. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011; 141(3):558-69. DOI: 10.1037/a0026035. View

Zeki S . The neurology of ambiguity. Conscious Cogn. 2004; 13(1):173-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2003.10.003. View

Lang P, Greenwald M, Bradley M, Hamm A . Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology. 1993; 30(3):261-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x. View

BERLYNE D . The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. J Exp Psychol. 1958; 55(3):289-96. DOI: 10.1037/h0043555. View

10.

Jakesch M, Leder H, Forster M . Image ambiguity and fluency. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e74084. PMC: 3764012. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074084. View

11.

Brieber D, Nadal M, Leder H . In the white cube: museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014; 154:36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.004. View

12.

Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D . A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol. 2004; 95(Pt 4):489-508. DOI: 10.1348/0007126042369811. View

13.

Leder H, Tinio P, Fuchs I, Bohrn I . When attractiveness demands longer looks: the effects of situation and gender. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010; 63(9):1858-71. DOI: 10.1080/17470211003605142. View

14.

Noguchi Y, Murota M . Temporal dynamics of neural activity in an integration of visual and contextual information in an esthetic preference task. Neuropsychologia. 2013; 51(6):1077-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.003. View

15.

Judd C, Westfall J, Kenny D . Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 103(1):54-69. DOI: 10.1037/a0028347. View

16.

Lacey S, Hagtvedt H, Patrick V, Anderson A, Stilla R, Deshpande G . Art for reward's sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum. Neuroimage. 2010; 55(1):420-33. PMC: 3031763. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027. View

17.

Kwart D, Foulsham T, Kingstone A . Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Perception. 2013; 41(8):925-38. DOI: 10.1068/p7136. View

18.

Kirk U, Skov M, Hulme O, Christensen M, Zeki S . Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):1125-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009. View

19.

Leckart B, Faw T . Looking time: a bibliography. Percept Mot Skills. 1968; 27(1):91-5. View

20.

Huang M, Bridge H, Kemp M, Parker A . Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5:134. PMC: 3225016. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00134. View