» Articles » PMID: 36225963

Fully Automatic Cardiac Four Chamber and Great Vessel Segmentation on CT Pulmonary Angiography Using Deep Learning

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is an essential test in the work-up of suspected pulmonary vascular disease including pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary embolism. Cardiac and great vessel assessments on CTPA are based on visual assessment and manual measurements which are known to have poor reproducibility. The primary aim of this study was to develop an automated whole heart segmentation (four chamber and great vessels) model for CTPA.

Methods: A nine structure semantic segmentation model of the heart and great vessels was developed using 200 patients (80/20/100 training/validation/internal testing) with testing in 20 external patients. Ground truth segmentations were performed by consultant cardiothoracic radiologists. Failure analysis was conducted in 1,333 patients with mixed pulmonary vascular disease. Segmentation was achieved using deep learning a convolutional neural network. Volumetric imaging biomarkers were correlated with invasive haemodynamics in the test cohort.

Results: Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for segmented structures were in the range 0.58-0.93 for both the internal and external test cohorts. The left and right ventricle myocardium segmentations had lower DSC of 0.83 and 0.58 respectively while all other structures had DSC >0.89 in the internal test cohort and >0.87 in the external test cohort. Interobserver comparison found that the left and right ventricle myocardium segmentations showed the most variation between observers: mean DSC (range) of 0.795 (0.785-0.801) and 0.520 (0.482-0.542) respectively. Right ventricle myocardial volume had strong correlation with mean pulmonary artery pressure (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.7). The volume of segmented cardiac structures by deep learning had higher or equivalent correlation with invasive haemodynamics than by manual segmentations. The model demonstrated good generalisability to different vendors and hospitals with similar performance in the external test cohort. The failure rates in mixed pulmonary vascular disease were low (<3.9%) indicating good generalisability of the model to different diseases.

Conclusion: Fully automated segmentation of the four cardiac chambers and great vessels has been achieved in CTPA with high accuracy and low rates of failure. DL volumetric biomarkers can potentially improve CTPA cardiac assessment and invasive haemodynamic prediction.

Citing Articles

Accurate fully automated assessment of left ventricle, left atrium, and left atrial appendage function from computed tomography using deep learning.

Jollans L, Bustamante M, Henriksson L, Persson A, Ebbers T Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025; 2(4):qyaf011.

PMID: 40051867 PMC: 11883084. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf011.


Revolutionizing Cardiology: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography.

Maturi B, Dulal S, Sayana S, Ibrahim A, Ramakrishna M, Chinta V J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2.

PMID: 39860630 PMC: 11766369. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020625.


Automatic Aortic Valve Extraction Using Deep Learning with Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT Images.

Inomata S, Yoshimura T, Tang M, Ichikawa S, Sugimori H J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852281 PMC: 11766280. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010003.


Fully Automated Assessment of Cardiac Chamber Volumes and Myocardial Mass on Non-Contrast Chest CT with a Deep Learning Model: Validation Against Cardiac MR.

Schmitt R, Schlett C, Sperl J, Rapaka S, Jacob A, Hein M Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767245 PMC: 11675647. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242884.


Emerging multimodality imaging techniques for the pulmonary circulation.

Rajagopal S, Bogaard H, Elbaz M, Freed B, Remy-Jardin M, van Beek E Eur Respir J. 2024; 64(4).

PMID: 39209480 PMC: 11525339. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01128-2024.


References
1.
Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson C, Schiebler M, Leung A, Wild J, Hoeper M . Imaging of pulmonary hypertension in adults: a position paper from the Fleischner Society. Eur Respir J. 2021; 57(1). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04455-2020. View

2.
Kiely D, Levin D, Hassoun P, Ivy D, Jone P, Bwika J . EXPRESS: Statement on imaging and pulmonary hypertension from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute (PVRI). Pulm Circ. 2019; :2045894019841990. PMC: 6732869. DOI: 10.1177/2045894019841990. View

3.
Hahn L, Hall K, Alebdi T, Kligerman S, Hsiao A . Automated Deep Learning Analysis for Quality Improvement of CT Pulmonary Angiography. Radiol Artif Intell. 2022; 4(2):e210162. PMC: 8980873. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210162. View

4.
Augusto J, Davies R, Bhuva A, Knott K, Seraphim A, Alfarih M . Diagnosis and risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using machine learning wall thickness measurement: a comparison with human test-retest performance. Lancet Digit Health. 2021; 3(1):e20-e28. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30267-3. View

5.
Kumamaru K, George E, Aghayev A, Saboo S, Khandelwal A, Rodriguez-Lopez S . Implementation and Performance of Automated Software for Computing Right-to-Left Ventricular Diameter Ratio From Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016; 40(3):387-92. PMC: 6095645. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000375. View