Automated Calculation of the Right Ventricle to Left Ventricle Ratio on CT for the Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To assess the feasibility and reliability of the use of artificial intelligence post-processing to calculate the RV:LV diameter ratio on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and to investigate its prognostic value in patients with acute PE.
Methods: Single-centre, retrospective study of 101 consecutive patients with CTPA-proven acute PE. RV and LV volumes were segmented on 1-mm contrast-enhanced axial slices and maximal ventricular diameters were derived for RV:LV ratio using automated post-processing software (IMBIO LLC, USA) and compared to manual analysis in two observers, via intraclass coefficient correlation analysis. Each CTPA report was analysed for mention of the RV:LV ratio and compared to the automated RV:LV ratio. Thirty-day all-cause mortality post-CTPA was recorded.
Results: Automated RV:LV analysis was feasible in 87% (n = 88). RV:LV ratios ranged from 0.67 to 2.43, with 64% (n = 65) > 1.0. There was very strong agreement between manual and automated RV:LV ratios (ICC = 0.83, 0.77-0.88). The use of automated analysis led to a change in risk stratification in 45% of patients (n = 40). The AUC of the automated measurement for the prediction of all-cause 30-day mortality was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62-0.99).
Conclusion: The RV:LV ratio on CTPA can be reliably measured automatically in the majority of real-world cases of acute PE, with perfect reproducibility. The routine use of this automated analysis in clinical practice would add important prognostic information in patients with acute PE.
Key Points: • Automated calculation of the right ventricle to left ventricle ratio was feasible in the majority of patients and demonstrated perfect intraobserver variability. • Automated analysis would have added important prognostic information and altered risk stratification in the majority of patients. • The optimal cut-off value for the automated right ventricle to left ventricle ratio was 1.18, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 54% for the prediction of 30-day mortality.
Mohanarajan M, Salunke P, Arif A, Iglesias Gonzalez P, Ospina D, Benavides D Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78217.
PMID: 40026993 PMC: 11872007. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78217.
Shahzadi I, Zwanenburg A, Frohwein L, Schramm D, Meyer H, Hinnerichs M J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024; 15(4):1430-1440.
PMID: 38859660 PMC: 11294025. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13488.
The reproducibility of manual RV/LV ratio measurement on CT pulmonary angiography.
Lanham S, Maiter A, Swift A, Dwivedi K, Alabed S, Evans O BJR Open. 2024; 4(1):20220041.
PMID: 38495814 PMC: 10941330. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20220041.
Onder R, Tackin V, Kemaloglu C, Golbasi I Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023; 39(2):170-173.
PMID: 36785606 PMC: 9918679. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-022-01424-0.
Sharkey M, Taylor J, Alabed S, Dwivedi K, Karunasaagarar K, Johns C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:983859.
PMID: 36225963 PMC: 9549370. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.983859.