» Articles » PMID: 36221317

Nature of the Evidence Base and Strengths, Challenges and Recommendations in the Area of Nutrition and Health Claims: a Position Paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences

Overview
Journal Br J Nutr
Date 2022 Oct 12
PMID 36221317
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The regulation of health claims for foods by the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation is intended, primarily, to protect consumers from unscrupulous claims by ensuring claims are accurate and substantiated with high quality scientific evidence. In this position paper, the Academy of Nutrition Sciences uniquely recognises the of the transparent, rigorous scientific assessment by independent scientists of the evidence underpinning claims in Europe, an approach now independently adopted in UK. Further are the separation of risk assessment from risk management, and the extensive guidance for those submitting claims. Nevertheless, four main in assessing the scientific evidence and context remain: (i) defining a healthy population, (ii) undertaking efficacy trials for foods, (iii) developing clearly defined biomarkers for some trial outcomes and (iv) ensuring the composition of a food bearing a health claim is consistent with generally accepted nutrition principles. Although the Regulation aims to protect the consumer from harm, we identify some from consumer research: (i) making the wording of some health claims more easily understood and (ii) understanding the implications of the misperceptions around products bearing nutrition or health claims. are made to overcome these challenges. Further, the Academy that a dialogue is developed with the relevant national bodies about Article 12(c) in the Regulation. This should further clarify the GB Guidance to avoid the current non-level playing field between health professionals and untrained 'influencers' who are not covered by this Article about the communication of authorised claims within commercial communications.

Citing Articles

Health benefits and risks of fermented foods-the PIMENTO initiative.

Todorovic S, Akpinar A, Assuncao R, Bar C, Bavaro S, Berkel Kasikci M Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1458536.

PMID: 39309142 PMC: 11414650. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1458536.


Nature of the evidence base and approaches to guide nutrition interventions for individuals: a position paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences.

Hickson M, Papoutsakis C, Madden A, Smith M, Whelan K Br J Nutr. 2024; 131(10):1754-1773.

PMID: 38305040 PMC: 11074602. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524000291.

References
1.
Kardinaal A, van Erk M, Dutman A, Stroeve J, van de Steeg E, Bijlsma S . Quantifying phenotypic flexibility as the response to a high-fat challenge test in different states of metabolic health. FASEB J. 2015; 29(11):4600-13. DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-269852. View

2.
Williams C, Ordovas J, Lairon D, Hesketh J, Lietz G, Gibney M . The challenges for molecular nutrition research 1: linking genotype to healthy nutrition. Genes Nutr. 2008; 3(2):41-9. PMC: 2467452. DOI: 10.1007/s12263-008-0086-1. View

3.
Tapsell L . Evidence for health claims: a perspective from the Australia-New Zealand region. J Nutr. 2008; 138(6):1206S-9S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.6.1206S. View

4.
Yamada K, Sato-Mito N, Nagata J, Umegaki K . Health claim evidence requirements in Japan. J Nutr. 2008; 138(6):1192S-8S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.6.1192S. View

5.
Joost H, Gibney M, Cashman K, Gorman U, Hesketh J, Mueller M . Personalised nutrition: status and perspectives. Br J Nutr. 2007; 98(1):26-31. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507685195. View