Pressure Response to Fluid Challenge Administration in Hypotensive Surgical Patients: a Post-hoc Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Five Datasets

Overview

Journal J Clin Monit Comput

Publisher Springer

Specialties Anesthesiology
General Medicine
Medical Informatics

Date 2022 Oct 5

PMID 36197548

Authors

Antonio Messina

Davide Colombo

Giulia Lionetti

Lorenzo Calabro

Katerina Negri

Chiara Robba

Gianmaria Cammarota

Elena Costantini

Maurizio Cecconi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this study we evaluated the effect of fluid challenge (FC) administration in elective surgical patients with low or normal blood pressure. Secondarily, we appraised the pharmacodynamic effect of FC in normotensive and hypotensive patients. We assessed five merged datasets of patients with a baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) above or below 65 mmHg and assessed the changes of systolic, diastolic, mean and dicrotic arterial pressures, dynamic indexes of fluid responsiveness and arterial elastance over a 10-min infusion. The hemodynamic effect was assessed by considering the net area under the curve (AUC), the maximal percentage difference from baseline (d), the time when the maximal value was observed (t) and change from baseline at 5-min (d) after FC end. A stroke volume index increase > 10% with respect to the baseline value after FC administration indicated fluid response. Two hundred-seventeen patients were analysed [102 (47.0%) fluid responders]. On average, FC restored a MAP [Formula: see text] 65 mmHg after 5 min. The AUCs and the d of pressure variables and arterial elastance of hypotensive patients were all significantly greater than normotensive patients. Pressure variables and arterial elastance changes in the hypotensive group were all significantly higher at d as compared to the normotensive group. In hypotensive patients, FC restores a MAP [Formula: see text] 65 mmHg after 5 min from infusion start. The hemodynamic profile of FC in hypotensive and normotensive patients is different; both the magnitude of pressure augmentation and duration is greater in the hypotensive group.

References

Kehlet H, Joshi G . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Current Controversies and Concerns. Anesth Analg. 2017; 125(6):2154-2155. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002231. View

Sessler D, Bloomstone J, Aronson S, Berry C, Gan T, Kellum J . Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on intraoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122(5):563-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.013. View

Messina A, Robba C, Calabro L, Zambelli D, Iannuzzi F, Molinari E . Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021; 25(1):43. PMC: 7849093. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03464-1. View

Messina A, Robba C, Calabro L, Zambelli D, Iannuzzi F, Molinari E . Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery. Crit Care. 2021; 25(1):205. PMC: 8194047. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03629-y. View

Bijker J, van Klei W, Kappen T, van Wolfswinkel L, Moons K, Kalkman C . Incidence of intraoperative hypotension as a function of the chosen definition: literature definitions applied to a retrospective cohort using automated data collection. Anesthesiology. 2007; 107(2):213-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000270724.40897.8e. View

Bijker J, van Klei W, Vergouwe Y, Eleveld D, van Wolfswinkel L, Moons K . Intraoperative hypotension and 1-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(6):1217-26. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c14930. View

Mascha E, Yang D, Weiss S, Sessler D . Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure Variability and 30-day Mortality in Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015; 123(1):79-91. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000686. View

Wesselink E, Kappen T, Torn H, Slooter A, van Klei W . Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121(4):706-721. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036. View

Pearse R, Harrison D, MacDonald N, Gillies M, Blunt M, Ackland G . Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014; 311(21):2181-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305. View

10.

Michard F, Giglio M, Brienza N . Perioperative goal-directed therapy with uncalibrated pulse contour methods: impact on fluid management and postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex138. View

11.

Navarro L, Bloomstone J, Costa Auler Jr J, Cannesson M, Rocca G, Gan T . Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond). 2015; 4:3. PMC: 4403901. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-015-0014-z. View

12.

Aya H, Rhodes A, Chis Ster I, Fletcher N, Grounds R, Cecconi M . Hemodynamic Effect of Different Doses of Fluids for a Fluid Challenge: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Study. Crit Care Med. 2016; 45(2):e161-e168. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002067. View

13.

Aya H, Chis Ster I, Fletcher N, Grounds R, Rhodes A, Cecconi M . Pharmacodynamic Analysis of a Fluid Challenge. Crit Care Med. 2015; 44(5):880-91. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001517. View

14.

Messina A, Palandri C, De Rosa S, Danzi V, Bonaldi E, Montagnini C . Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021; 36(4):1193-1203. PMC: 8423602. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3. View

15.

Pouska J, Tegl V, Astapenko D, Cerny V, Lehmann C, Benes J . Impact of Intravenous Fluid Challenge Infusion Time on Macrocirculation and Endothelial Glycocalyx in Surgical and Critically Ill Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:8925345. PMC: 6241356. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8925345. View

16.

Monge Garcia M, Guijo Gonzalez P, Gracia Romero M, Gil Cano A, Oscier C, Rhodes A . Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(7):1247-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3898-7. View

17.

Monge Garcia M, Gracia Romero M, Gil Cano A, Aya H, Rhodes A, Grounds R . Dynamic arterial elastance as a predictor of arterial pressure response to fluid administration: a validation study. Crit Care. 2014; 18(6):626. PMC: 4271484. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0626-6. View

18.

Zampieri F, Machado F, Biondi R, Freitas F, Veiga V, Figueiredo R . Effect of Slower vs Faster Intravenous Fluid Bolus Rates on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021; 326(9):830-838. PMC: 8356145. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.11444. View

19.

Messina A, DellAnna A, Baggiani M, Torrini F, Maresca G, Bennett V . Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of the end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):264. PMC: 6664788. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2545-z. View

20.

Messina A, Romano S, Bonicolini E, Colombo D, Cammarota G, Chiostri M . Cardiac cycle efficiency and dicrotic pressure variations: new parameters for fluid therapy: An observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017; 34(11):755-763. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000661. View