» Articles » PMID: 25897397

Perioperative Fluid Therapy: a Statement from the International Fluid Optimization Group

Abstract

Background: Perioperative fluid therapy remains a highly debated topic. Its purpose is to maintain or restore effective circulating blood volume during the immediate perioperative period. Maintaining effective circulating blood volume and pressure are key components of assuring adequate organ perfusion while avoiding the risks associated with either organ hypo- or hyperperfusion. Relative to perioperative fluid therapy, three inescapable conclusions exist: overhydration is bad, underhydration is bad, and what we assume about the fluid status of our patients may be incorrect. There is wide variability of practice, both between individuals and institutions. The aims of this paper are to clearly define the risks and benefits of fluid choices within the perioperative space, to describe current evidence-based methodologies for their administration, and ultimately to reduce the variability with which perioperative fluids are administered.

Methods: Based on the abovementioned acknowledgements, a group of 72 researchers, well known within the field of fluid resuscitation, were invited, via email, to attend a meeting that was held in Chicago in 2011 to discuss perioperative fluid therapy. From the 72 invitees, 14 researchers representing 7 countries attended, and thus, the international Fluid Optimization Group (FOG) came into existence. These researches, working collaboratively, have reviewed the data from 162 different fluid resuscitation papers including both operative and intensive care unit populations. This manuscript is the result of 3 years of evidence-based, discussions, analysis, and synthesis of the currently known risks and benefits of individual fluids and the best methods for administering them.

Results: The results of this review paper provide an overview of the components of an effective perioperative fluid administration plan and address both the physiologic principles and outcomes of fluid administration.

Conclusions: We recommend that both perioperative fluid choice and therapy be individualized. Patients should receive fluid therapy guided by predefined physiologic targets. Specifically, fluids should be administered when patients require augmentation of their perfusion and are also volume responsive. This paper provides a general approach to fluid therapy and practical recommendations.

Citing Articles

Association between intraoperative fluid management and postoperative outcomes in living kidney donors: a retrospective cohort study.

Lee J, Chung C, Park S, Lee K, Kim G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3181.

PMID: 39863667 PMC: 11763073. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87497-4.


Systematic review and meta-analysis of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy algorithms during surgery for the prevention of surgical site infection.

Jalalzadeh H, Hulskes R, Weenink R, Wolfhagen N, van Dusseldorp I, Schaad R EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 78:102944.

PMID: 39687427 PMC: 11647171. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102944.


Heart failure diagnostic accuracy, intraoperative fluid management, and postoperative acute kidney injury: a single-centre prospective observational study.

Mathis M, Ghadimi K, Benner A, Jewell E, Janda A, Joo H Br J Anaesth. 2024; 134(1):32-44.

PMID: 39389834 PMC: 11832916. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.020.


Novel parameters for predicting fluid responsiveness during the mini fluid challenge and ability of the cardiac power index: an observational cohort study.

Abdullah T, Gokduman H, Eniste I, Atasever A, Ali A, Ozcan F Turk J Med Sci. 2024; 53(5):1224-1233.

PMID: 38813019 PMC: 10763793. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5688.


Epidemiology of perioperative RV dysfunction: risk factors, incidence, and clinical implications.

Shelley B, McAreavey R, McCall P Perioper Med (Lond). 2024; 13(1):31.

PMID: 38664769 PMC: 11046908. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00388-6.


References
1.
Michard F . Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103(2):419-28. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00026. View

2.
Wilms H, Mittal A, Haydock M, van den Heever M, Devaud M, Windsor J . A systematic review of goal directed fluid therapy: rating of evidence for goals and monitoring methods. J Crit Care. 2013; 29(2):204-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.019. View

3.
Khuri S, Henderson W, DePalma R, Mosca C, Healey N, Kumbhani D . Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(3):326-41. PMC: 1357741. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179621.33268.83. View

4.
Holte K, Sharrock N, Kehlet H . Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89(4):622-32. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aef220. View

5.
Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Henaine R . The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(2):513-7. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318192a36b. View