» Articles » PMID: 36110672

A Comparative Study of Mid-Crestal Incision and Diode Laser Shaped Incision to Assess Papilla Level in Second Stage Dental Implant Surgery

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 Sep 16
PMID 36110672
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess papilla level using different techniques in a second stage dental implant surgery.

Materials And Methods: Thirty patients who received 45 dental implants were equally divided into 3 groups of 10 each. Group I patients were operated with a scalpel with mid-crestal incision. In group II, dental implants were exposed with a gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser. In group III, dental implants were exposed with I shaped incision using a scalpel. Assessment of modified gingival index (mGI), modified plaque index (mPI), and Jemt index were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The measurement of FAJI, FAJAdj, ST height, and CP Bone crest was performed.

Results: A significant difference in crestal bone level of FAJ- I, FAJ- adj, ST height, and CP Bone crest was recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months among groups I, II, and III ( < 0.05). At 6 months, both groups II and III exhibited >60% of papilla fill as compared to group I.

Conclusion: Diode laser offers maximum papillary fill and resulted in less crestal bone loss as compared to mid-crestal and I shaped incision during a second stage surgery.

References
1.
Jemt T . Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17(4):326-33. View

2.
Yeh S, Jain K, Andreana S . Using a diode laser to uncover dental implants in second-stage surgery. Gen Dent. 2005; 53(6):414-7. View

3.
Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S . Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(6):662-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01887.x. View

4.
Lee D, Park K, Moon I . Dimension of keratinized mucosa and the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol. 2005; 76(11):1856-60. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1856. View

5.
Gastaldo J, Ramos Cury P, Sendyk W . Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. J Periodontol. 2004; 75(9):1242-6. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1242. View