» Articles » PMID: 11495146

Interimplant Papilla Reconstruction: Assessment of Soft Tissue Changes and Results of 12 Consecutive Cases

Overview
Journal J Periodontol
Date 2001 Aug 10
PMID 11495146
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Loss of soft tissue between adjacent implants is a frequent occurrence. Reconstruction of the papilla between adjacent implants is often necessary where there are esthetic demands. The purpose of this article is to describe a fixed and reproducible reference line which can be used to measure changes in the height of the interimplant papillae. A surgical technique carried out at the time of the abutment connection surgery is also described to show the changes that may occur over a 12-month period. Assessment of changes in the soft tissue dimension is shown following a modified flap technique at the time of abutment connection.

Methods: With the aid of clinical photographs taken preoperatively, a reference line can be drawn between the highest point of the gingival margins on teeth distal to the intended site of soft tissue surgery. This reference line can be reproduced on clinical photographs postoperatively. Using this reference line, the changes in soft tissue height using a modified flap technique in 12 consecutive patients are presented. Assessment of the vertical height of the interimplant papillae before and after treatment is described.

Results: Four patients showed an increase in the height of the papillae when reviewed 12 months following abutment connection. One patient showed no change in the height of the papillae, and 7 patients showed a loss in papillary height. There was an average loss of 0.5 mm in height of the interimplant soft tissue.

Conclusions: Use of a fixed reference line to assess the outcome of treatment is necessary when evaluating vertical changes in soft tissue. This reference line is used to assess a soft tissue flap technique carried out at the time of implant exposure.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Survival Rates of Dental Implants and the Risk Factors: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study.

Jain S, Hemavardhini A, Ranjan M, Pasricha N, Thakar S, Soni K Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55360.

PMID: 38562355 PMC: 10982840. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55360.


Comparison of crestal bone loss and papilla fill after conventional and immediate implant placement: A 12 month clinical and radiographic prospective study.

Raj A, Pradhan S, Shetty P, Kadakampally D, Shetty N F1000Res. 2023; 12:821.

PMID: 38106651 PMC: 10724648. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.131411.1.


The Buccal Pedicle Sliding Flap Technique for Keratinized Tissue Augmentation During the Second-Stage Surgery: A Report of Two Cases.

Akolu P, Lele P, Dodwad V, Yewale M Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e46362.

PMID: 37920614 PMC: 10619594. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46362.


Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the esthetic region: A systematic review and 10-year results of a prospective comparative pilot study.

Meijer H, Stellingsma K, Pol C, Vissink A, Gareb B, Raghoebar G Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023; 9(6):954-968.

PMID: 37592440 PMC: 10728520. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.773.


Do different incision techniques for implant surgery affect gingival papilla height around dental implants? A retrospective study of 115 cases.

Luo C, Chen M BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):128.

PMID: 36890532 PMC: 9996942. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02828-z.