» Articles » PMID: 36076192

Long-term Outcomes at 24- and 36-month Follow-up in the Intervention Arm of the Randomized Controlled Trial of Prompt Mental Health Care

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Sep 8
PMID 36076192
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Whether long-term symptom improvement is maintained after treatment in services such as the Norwegian Prompt Mental Health Care (PMHC) and the English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies is not yet known. In this prospective study, we investigate whether improvements observed at 6-month follow-up are maintained at 24- and 36-month follow-up among clients who received PMHC.

Method: Data from the treatment arm of the randomized controlled trial of PMHC were used (n = 459). The main outcomes were (reliable) recovery rate and symptoms of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7). Primary outcome data at 24- and 36-months follow-up were available for 47% and 39% of participants, respectively. Secondary outcomes were work participation, functional status, health-related quality of life, and positive mental well-being. Sensitivity analyses with regard to missing data assumptions were conducted for the primary continuous outcomes.

Results: Improvements were maintained at 24- and 36-month follow-up for symptoms of depression and anxiety, (reliable) recovery rate, and health-related quality of life. Small linear improvements since 6-month follow-up were observed for work participation, functional status, and positive mental well-being. Sensitivity analyses did not substantially alter the findings for symptoms of depression and anxiety mentioned above.

Conclusions: Our findings support the long-term effectiveness of PMHC, but results should be interpreted with caution due to lacking follow-up data at 24- and 36-month in the control group, and substantial attrition.

Citing Articles

Brief CBT-based psychological interventions to improve mental health outcomes in refugee populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daniel N, Liu X, Thomas E, Eraneva-Dibb E, Ahmad A, Heneghan C Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024; 15(1):2389702.

PMID: 39212049 PMC: 11370682. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2389702.

References
1.
McKnight P, Kashdan T . The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: a case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29(3):243-59. PMC: 2814224. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.005. View

2.
Wakefield S, Kellett S, Simmonds-Buckley M, Stockton D, Bradbury A, Delgadillo J . Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence. Br J Clin Psychol. 2020; 60(1):1-37. DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12259. View

3.
Sobocki P, Ekman M, Agren H, Krakau I, Runeson B, Martensson B . Health-related quality of life measured with EQ-5D in patients treated for depression in primary care. Value Health. 2007; 10(2):153-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00162.x. View

4.
Rabin R, de Charro F . EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001; 33(5):337-43. DOI: 10.3109/07853890109002087. View

5.
Smith O, Knapstad M, Alves D, Aaro L . Initial Results of Prompt Mental Health Care, the Norwegian Version of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies. Psychother Psychosom. 2017; 86(6):382-384. DOI: 10.1159/000477668. View