Is DIA Proteomics Data FAIR? Current Data Sharing Practices, Available Bioinformatics Infrastructure and Recommendations for the Future

Overview

Journal Proteomics

Date 2022 Sep 8

PMID 36074795

Authors

Andrew R Jones

Eric W Deutsch

Juan Antonio Vizcaino

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Data independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics techniques have matured enormously in recent years, thanks to multiple technical developments in, for example, instrumentation and data analysis approaches. However, there are many improvements that are still possible for DIA data in the area of the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability) data principles. These include more tailored data sharing practices and open data standards since public databases and data standards for proteomics were mostly designed with DDA data in mind. Here we first describe the current state of the art in the context of FAIR data for proteomics in general, and for DIA approaches in particular. For improving the current situation for DIA data, we make the following recommendations for the future: (i) development of an open data standard for spectral libraries; (ii) make mandatory the availability of the spectral libraries used in DIA experiments in ProteomeXchange resources; (iii) improve the support for DIA data in the data standards developed by the Proteomics Standards Initiative; and (iv) improve the support for DIA datasets in ProteomeXchange resources, including more tailored metadata requirements.

Citing Articles

Integrated View of Baseline Protein Expression in Human Tissues Using Public Data Independent Acquisition Data Sets.

Prakash A, Collins A, Vilmovsky L, Fexova S, Jones A, Vizcaino J J Proteome Res. 2025; 24(2):685-695.

PMID: 39764611 PMC: 11811993. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00788.

The Proteomics Standards Initiative Standardized Formats for Spectral Libraries and Fragment Ion Peak Annotations: mzSpecLib and mzPAF.

Klein J, Lam H, Mak T, Bittremieux W, Perez-Riverol Y, Gabriels R Anal Chem. 2024; 96(46):18491-18501.

PMID: 39514576 PMC: 11579979. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04091.

Proteomics Standards Initiative at Twenty Years: Current Activities and Future Work.

Deutsch E, Vizcaino J, Jones A, Binz P, Lam H, Klein J J Proteome Res. 2023; 22(2):287-301.

PMID: 36626722 PMC: 9903322. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00637.

The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update.

Deutsch E, Bandeira N, Perez-Riverol Y, Sharma V, Carver J, Mendoza L Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 51(D1):D1539-D1548.

PMID: 36370099 PMC: 9825490. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1040.

Is DIA proteomics data FAIR? Current data sharing practices, available bioinformatics infrastructure and recommendations for the future.

Jones A, Deutsch E, Vizcaino J Proteomics. 2022; 23(7-8):e2200014.

PMID: 36074795 PMC: 10155627. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202200014.

References

Chalkley R, MacCoss M, Jaffe J, Rost H . Initial Guidelines for Manuscripts Employing Data-independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry for Proteomic Analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2019; 18(1):1-2. PMC: 6317474. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.E118.001286. View

Chambers M, MacLean B, Burke R, Amodei D, Ruderman D, Neumann S . A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30(10):918-20. PMC: 3471674. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2377. View

Lautenbacher L, Samaras P, Muller J, Grafberger A, Shraideh M, Rank J . ProteomicsDB: toward a FAIR open-source resource for life-science research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 50(D1):D1541-D1552. PMC: 8728203. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1026. View

Gotti C, Roux-Dalvai F, Joly-Beauparlant C, Mangnier L, Leclercq M, Droit A . Extensive and Accurate Benchmarking of DIA Acquisition Methods and Software Tools Using a Complex Proteomic Standard. J Proteome Res. 2021; 20(10):4801-4814. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00490. View

Griss J, Jones A, Sachsenberg T, Walzer M, Gatto L, Hartler J . The mzTab data exchange format: communicating mass-spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics experimental results to a wider audience. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014; 13(10):2765-75. PMC: 4189001. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O113.036681. View

Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

Montecchi-Palazzi L, Beavis R, Binz P, Chalkley R, Cottrell J, Creasy D . The PSI-MOD community standard for representation of protein modification data. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26(8):864-6. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0808-864. View

Gillet L, Navarro P, Tate S, Rost H, Selevsek N, Reiter L . Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012; 11(6):O111.016717. PMC: 3433915. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717. View

Mayer G, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Ovelleiro D, Jones A, Binz P, Deutsch E . The HUPO proteomics standards initiative- mass spectrometry controlled vocabulary. Database (Oxford). 2013; 2013:bat009. PMC: 3594986. DOI: 10.1093/database/bat009. View

10.

Ezkurdia I, Juan D, Rodriguez J, Frankish A, Diekhans M, Harrow J . Multiple evidence strands suggest that there may be as few as 19,000 human protein-coding genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23(22):5866-78. PMC: 4204768. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu309. View

11.

Gessulat S, Schmidt T, Zolg D, Samaras P, Schnatbaum K, Zerweck J . Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning. Nat Methods. 2019; 16(6):509-518. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0426-7. View

12.

Martens L, Chambers M, Sturm M, Kessner D, Levander F, Shofstahl J . mzML--a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010; 10(1):R110.000133. PMC: 3013463. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R110.000133. View

13.

Fondrie W, Bittremieux W, Noble W . ppx: Programmatic Access to Proteomics Data Repositories. J Proteome Res. 2021; 20(9):4621-4624. PMC: 8457024. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00454. View

14.

Moreno P, Fexova S, George N, Manning J, Miao Z, Mohammed S . Expression Atlas update: gene and protein expression in multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 50(D1):D129-D140. PMC: 8728300. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1030. View

15.

Rost H, Rosenberger G, Navarro P, Gillet L, Miladinovic S, Schubert O . OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(3):219-23. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2841. View

16.

Ting Y, Egertson J, Bollinger J, Searle B, Payne S, Noble W . PECAN: library-free peptide detection for data-independent acquisition tandem mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(9):903-908. PMC: 5578911. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4390. View

17.

Ochoa D, Jarnuczak A, Vieitez C, Gehre M, Soucheray M, Mateus A . The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 38(3):365-373. PMC: 7100915. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0344-3. View

18.

Vizcaino J, Deutsch E, Wang R, Csordas A, Reisinger F, Rios D . ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(3):223-6. PMC: 3986813. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2839. View

19.

Sivade Dumousseau M, Alonso-Lopez D, Ammari M, Bradley G, Campbell N, Ceol A . Encompassing new use cases - level 3.0 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018; 19(1):134. PMC: 5896046. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2118-1. View

20.

Hulstaert N, Shofstahl J, Sachsenberg T, Walzer M, Barsnes H, Martens L . ThermoRawFileParser: Modular, Scalable, and Cross-Platform RAW File Conversion. J Proteome Res. 2019; 19(1):537-542. PMC: 7116465. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00328. View