» Articles » PMID: 21541821

The Cognitive Reflection Test As a Predictor of Performance on Heuristics-and-biases Tasks

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 May 5
PMID 21541821
Citations 139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is designed to measure the tendency to override a prepotent response alternative that is incorrect and to engage in further reflection that leads to the correct response. In this study, we showed that the CRT is a more potent predictor of performance on a wide sample of tasks from the heuristics-and-biases literature than measures of cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and executive functioning. Although the CRT has a substantial correlation with cognitive ability, a series of regression analyses indicated that the CRT was a unique predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. It accounted for substantial additional variance after the other measures of individual differences had been statistically controlled. We conjecture that this is because neither intelligence tests nor measures of executive functioning assess the tendency toward miserly processing in the way that the CRT does. We argue that the CRT is a particularly potent measure of the tendency toward miserly processing because it is a performance measure rather than a self-report measure.

Citing Articles

Cognitive reflection is a distinct and measurable trait.

Meyer A, Attali Y, Bar-Hillel M, Frederick S, Kahneman D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(49):e2409191121.

PMID: 39602272 PMC: 11626181. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2409191121.


Cognitive support for political partisans' understanding of policy data.

Yu S, Opfer J PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312088.

PMID: 39405299 PMC: 11478866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312088.


Single session and repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex increases reflective thinking but not working memory updating performance.

Edgcumbe D, Rivolta D, Nitsche M, Thoma V Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36078.

PMID: 39253169 PMC: 11382065. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36078.


Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation.

Dhami M, Belton I, De Werd P, Hadzhieva V, Wicke L Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):37.

PMID: 38866984 PMC: 11169332. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00560-y.


Sex Differences in Cognitive Reflection: A Meta-Analysis.

Otero I, Martinez A, Cuadrado D, Lado M, Moscoso S, Salgado J J Intell. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38667706 PMC: 11051326. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence12040039.


References
1.
Ackerman P, Heggestad E . Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. Psychol Bull. 1997; 121(2):219-45. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219. View

2.
Salthouse T, Atkinson T, Berish D . Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(4):566-94. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566. View

3.
Epstein S, Meier P . Constructive thinking: a broad coping variable with specific components. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 57(2):332-50. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.2.332. View

4.
Stanovich K, Toplak M, West R . The development of rational thought: a taxonomy of heuristics and biases. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2008; 36:251-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)00006-2. View

5.
Koehler D, James G . Probability matching and strategy availability. Mem Cognit. 2010; 38(6):667-76. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.6.667. View