» Articles » PMID: 35984888

Proteomic Profiling Platforms Head to Head: Leveraging Genetics and Clinical Traits to Compare Aptamer- and Antibody-based Methods

Abstract

High-throughput proteomic profiling using antibody or aptamer-based affinity reagents is used increasingly in human studies. However, direct analyses to address the relative strengths and weaknesses of these platforms are lacking. We assessed findings from the SomaScan1.3K ( = 1301 reagents), the SomaScan5K platform ( = 4979 reagents), and the Olink Explore ( = 1472 reagents) profiling techniques in 568 adults from the Jackson Heart Study and 219 participants in the HERITAGE Family Study across four performance domains: precision, accuracy, analytic breadth, and phenotypic associations leveraging detailed clinical phenotyping and genetic data. Across these studies, we show evidence supporting more reliable protein target specificity and a higher number of phenotypic associations for the Olink platform, while the Soma platforms benefit from greater measurement precision and analytic breadth across the proteome.

Citing Articles

Biomarker identification for Alzheimer's disease through integration of comprehensive Mendelian randomization and proteomics data.

Zhan H, Cammann D, Cummings J, Dong X, Chen J J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):278.

PMID: 40050982 PMC: 11884171. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-025-06317-5.


Mass-spectrometry-based proteomics: from single cells to clinical applications.

Guo T, Steen J, Mann M Nature. 2025; 638(8052):901-911.

PMID: 40011722 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08584-0.


Plasma proteomics for cognitive decline and dementia-A Southeast Asian cohort study.

Sim M, Doecke J, Liew O, Wong L, Tan E, Chan S Alzheimers Dement. 2025; 21(2):e14577.

PMID: 39998981 PMC: 11854348. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14577.


Cross-Ancestry Comparison of Aptamer and Antibody Proteomics Measures.

Nicholas J, Raffield L, Katz D, Nicholas J, Tahir U, Katz D Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39989965 PMC: 11844639. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5968391/v1.


Comparative studies of 2168 plasma proteins measured by two affinity-based platforms in 4000 Chinese adults.

Wang B, Pozarickij A, Mazidi M, Wright N, Yao P, Said S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1869.

PMID: 39984443 PMC: 11845630. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56935-2.


References
1.
Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Bjorkesten J, Thorsen S, Ekman D . Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e95192. PMC: 3995906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095192. View

2.
Benson M, Yang Q, Ngo D, Zhu Y, Shen D, Farrell L . Genetic Architecture of the Cardiovascular Risk Proteome. Circulation. 2017; 137(11):1158-1172. PMC: 5849518. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029536. View

3.
Kamat M, Blackshaw J, Young R, Surendran P, Burgess S, Danesh J . PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics. 2019; 35(22):4851-4853. PMC: 6853652. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz469. View

4.
Tan A, Abecasis G, Kang H . Unified representation of genetic variants. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(13):2202-4. PMC: 4481842. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv112. View

5.
McClellan J, Lehner T, King M . Gene Discovery for Complex Traits: Lessons from Africa. Cell. 2017; 171(2):261-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.037. View