» Articles » PMID: 35858045

Inference and Uncertainty Quantification of Stochastic Gene Expression Via Synthetic Models

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Estimating uncertainty in model predictions is a central task in quantitative biology. Biological models at the single-cell level are intrinsically stochastic and nonlinear, creating formidable challenges for their statistical estimation which inevitably has to rely on approximations that trade accuracy for tractability. Despite intensive interest, a sweet spot in this trade-off has not been found yet. We propose a flexible procedure for uncertainty quantification in a wide class of reaction networks describing stochastic gene expression including those with feedback. The method is based on creating a tractable coarse-graining of the model that is learned from simulations, a , to approximate the likelihood function. We demonstrate that synthetic models can substantially outperform state-of-the-art approaches on a number of non-trivial systems and datasets, yielding an accurate and computationally viable solution to uncertainty quantification in stochastic models of gene expression.

Citing Articles

3D chromatin architecture, BRD4, and Mediator have distinct roles in regulating genome-wide transcriptional bursting and gene network.

Trzaskoma P, Jung S, Pekowska A, Bohrer C, Wang X, Naz F Sci Adv. 2024; 10(32):eadl4893.

PMID: 39121214 PMC: 11313860. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl4893.


Gene expression model inference from snapshot RNA data using Bayesian non-parametrics.

Kilic Z, Schweiger M, Moyer C, Shepherd D, Presse S Nat Comput Sci. 2023; 3(2):174-183.

PMID: 38125199 PMC: 10732567. DOI: 10.1038/s43588-022-00392-0.


Studying stochastic systems biology of the cell with single-cell genomics data.

Gorin G, Vastola J, Pachter L Cell Syst. 2023; 14(10):822-843.e22.

PMID: 37751736 PMC: 10725240. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.08.004.


Analysis and design of single-cell experiments to harvest fluctuation information while rejecting measurement noise.

Vo H, Forero-Quintero L, Aguilera L, Munsky B Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1133994.

PMID: 37305680 PMC: 10250612. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1133994.


Single-cell Ca parameter inference reveals how transcriptional states inform dynamic cell responses.

Wu X, Wollman R, MacLean A J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(203):20230172.

PMID: 37282589 PMC: 10244972. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0172.


References
1.
Toni T, Welch D, Strelkowa N, Ipsen A, Stumpf M . Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems. J R Soc Interface. 2009; 6(31):187-202. PMC: 2658655. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0172. View

2.
Jia C, Grima R . Dynamical phase diagram of an auto-regulating gene in fast switching conditions. J Chem Phys. 2020; 152(17):174110. DOI: 10.1063/5.0007221. View

3.
Schnoerr D, Sanguinetti G, Grima R . Comparison of different moment-closure approximations for stochastic chemical kinetics. J Chem Phys. 2015; 143(18):185101. DOI: 10.1063/1.4934990. View

4.
Taniguchi Y, Choi P, Li G, Chen H, Babu M, Hearn J . Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science. 2010; 329(5991):533-8. PMC: 2922915. DOI: 10.1126/science.1188308. View

5.
Jia C, Grima R . Small protein number effects in stochastic models of autoregulated bursty gene expression. J Chem Phys. 2020; 152(8):084115. DOI: 10.1063/1.5144578. View