» Articles » PMID: 35841123

MA-cont:pre/post Effect Size: An Interactive Tool for the Meta-analysis of Continuous Outcomes Using R Shiny

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 15
PMID 35841123
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a widely used methodology to combine evidence from different sources examining a common research phenomenon, to obtain a quantitative summary of the studied phenomenon. In the medical field, multiple studies investigate the effectiveness of new treatments and meta-analysis is largely performed to generate the summary (average) treatment effect. In the meta-analysis of aggregate continuous outcomes measured in a pretest-posttest design using differences in means as the effect measure, a plethora of methods exist: analysis of final (follow-up) scores, analysis of change scores and analysis of covariance. Specialised and general-purpose statistical software is used to apply the various methods, yet, often the choice among them depends on data availability and statistical affinity. We present a new web-based tool, MA-cont:pre/post effect size, to conduct meta-analysis of continuous data assessed pre- and post-treatment using the aforementioned approaches on aggregate data and a more flexible approach of generating and analysing pseudo individual participant data. The interactive web environment, available by R Shiny, is used to create this free-to-use statistical tool, requiring no programming skills by the users. A basic statistical understanding of the methods running in the background is a prerequisite and we encourage the users to seek advice from technical experts when necessary.

Citing Articles

Cardiopulmonary exercise response at high altitude in patients with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vecchiato M, Duregon F, Borasio N, Faggian S, Bassanello V, Aghi A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 11():1454680.

PMID: 39776864 PMC: 11703806. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1454680.


Foot-strike Hemolysis: A Scoping Review of Long-Distance Runners.

Gartner A, Dombrowski N, Lowe N, Behzadpour V, Zackula R Kans J Med. 2025; 17(5):119-124.

PMID: 39758544 PMC: 11698231. DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol17.22146.


Speckle-tracking echocardiography of left and right ventricle and acute cellular rejection in orthotropic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xourgia E, Brignoli K, Linder O, Neagoe A, Capek L, Bruno J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; .

PMID: 39636336 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03297-3.


Safety and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients: Synthesis of Evidence.

Bellos I, Lagiou P, Benetou V, Marinaki S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458136 PMC: 11508237. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206181.


Functional status following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rodrigues G, Santos R, Pinto R, Oliveira A, Marques A Chron Respir Dis. 2024; 21:14799731241255138.

PMID: 39440394 PMC: 11500222. DOI: 10.1177/14799731241255138.


References
1.
Papadimitropoulou K, Stijnen T, Dekkers O, le Cessie S . One-stage random effects meta-analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data. Res Synth Methods. 2018; 10(3):360-375. PMC: 6767371. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1331. View

2.
Owen R, Bradbury N, Xin Y, Cooper N, Sutton A . MetaInsight: An interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta-analyses using R-shiny and netmeta. Res Synth Methods. 2019; 10(4):569-581. PMC: 6973101. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1373. View

3.
Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I . Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(9):e1000326. PMC: 2943439. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326. View

4.
Fu R, Holmer H . Change score or follow-up score? Choice of mean difference estimates could impact meta-analysis conclusions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 76:108-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.034. View

5.
Hua H, Burke D, Crowther M, Ensor J, Tudur Smith C, Riley R . One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information. Stat Med. 2016; 36(5):772-789. PMC: 5299543. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7171. View