» Articles » PMID: 30999861

Development of an Interactive Web-based Tool to Conduct and Interrogate Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: MetaDTA

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Apr 20
PMID 30999861
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recommended statistical methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies require relatively complex bivariate statistical models which can be a barrier for non-statisticians. A further barrier exists in the software options available for fitting such models. Software accessible to non-statisticians, such as RevMan, does not support the fitting of bivariate models thus users must seek statistical support to use R, Stata or SAS. Recent advances in web technologies make analysis tool creation much simpler than previously. As well as accessibility, online tools can allow tailored interactivity not found in other packages allowing multiple perspectives of data to be displayed and information to be tailored to the user's preference from a simple interface. We set out to: (i) Develop a freely available web-based "point and click" interactive tool which allows users to input their DTA study data and conduct meta-analyses for DTA reviews, including sensitivity analyses. (ii) Illustrate the features and benefits of the interactive application using an existing DTA meta-analysis for detecting dementia.

Methods: To create our online freely available interactive application we used the existing R packages lme4 and Shiny to analyse the data and create an interactive user interface respectively.

Results: MetaDTA, an interactive online application was created for conducting meta-analysis of DTA studies. The user interface was designed to be easy to navigate having different tabs for different functions. Features include the ability for users to enter their own data, customise plots, incorporate quality assessment results and quickly conduct sensitivity analyses. All plots produced can be exported as either .png or .pdf files to be included in report documents. All tables can be exported as .csv files.

Conclusions: MetaDTA, is a freely available interactive online application which meta-analyses DTA studies, plots the summary ROC curve, incorporates quality assessment results and allows for sensitivity analyses to be conducted in a timely manner. Due to the rich feature-set and user-friendliness of the software it should appeal to a wide audience including those without specialist statistical knowledge. We encourage others to create similar applications for specialist analysis methods to encourage broader uptake which in-turn could improve research quality.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of AI Models in Detecting Heart Failure Using ECG Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Khan S, Qayyum K, Qadeer A, Khalid M, Anthony S, Khan W Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78683.

PMID: 40065863 PMC: 11891813. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78683.


Rapid molecular assays versus blood culture for bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rapszky G, Do To U, Kiss V, Koi T, Walter A, Gergo D EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 79:103028.

PMID: 39968206 PMC: 11833021. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103028.


A case study in statistical software development for advanced evidence synthesis: the combined value of analysts and research software engineers.

Bradbury N, Morris T, Nevill C, Nevill J, Field R, Freeman S BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):13.

PMID: 39825276 PMC: 11740572. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02450-9.


Breast thermography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Goni-Arana A, Perez-Martin J, Diez F Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):295.

PMID: 39609910 PMC: 11603657. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02708-9.


Serum and urine nucleic acid screening tests for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

Maung Myint T, Chong C, von Huben A, Attia J, Webster A, Blosser C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 11:CD014839.

PMID: 39606952 PMC: 11603539. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014839.pub2.


References
1.
Harbord R, Deeks J, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne J . A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics. 2006; 8(2):239-51. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004. View

2.
Yi J, Kang Y, Stasko J, Jacko J . Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2007; 13(6):1224-31. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70515. View

3.
Whiting P, Sterne J, Westwood M, Bachmann L, Harbord R, Egger M . Graphical presentation of diagnostic information. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:20. PMC: 2394529. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-20. View

4.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

5.
Littenberg B, MOSES L . Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making. 1993; 13(4):313-21. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300408. View