» Articles » PMID: 35837549

One Novel Phantom-Less Quantitative Computed Tomography System for Auto-Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Utilizes Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography Obtained for COVID-19 Screening

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 15
PMID 35837549
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is still one of the most critical topics for orthopedic surgeons worldwide. One research direction is to use existing clinical imaging data for accurate measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) without additional radiation. A novel phantom-less quantitative computed tomography (PL-QCT) system was developed to measure BMD and diagnose osteoporosis, as our previous study reported. Compared with traditional phantom-less QCT, this tool can conduct an automatic selection of body tissues and complete the BMD calibration with high efficacy and precision. The function has great advantages in big data screening and thus expands the scope of use of this novel PL-QCT. In this study, we utilized lung cancer or COVID-19 screening low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of 649 patients for BMD calibration by the novel PL-QCT, and we made the BMD changes with age based on this PL-QCT. The results show that the novel PL-QCT can predict osteoporosis with relatively high accuracy and precision using LDCT, and the AUC values range from 0.68 to 0.88 with DXA results as diagnosis reference. The relationship between PL-QCT BMD with age is close to the real trend population (from ∼160 mg/cc in less than 30 years old to ∼70 mg/cc in greater than 80 years old for both female and male groups). Additionally, the calculation results of Pearson's r-values for correlation between CT values with BMD in different CT devices were 0.85-0.99. To our knowledge, it is the first time for automatic PL-QCT to evaluate the performance against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in LDCT images. The results indicate that it may be a promising tool for individuals screened for low-dose chest computed tomography.

Citing Articles

Osteoporosis in axial radiographic spondyloarthritis: diagnostic limitations of bone mineral density and the need for comprehensive fracture risk assessment.

Zuchowski P, Dura M, Jeka D, Wojciechowski R, Bierwagen M, Kulakowski M Reumatologia. 2025; 62(6):466-474.

PMID: 39866305 PMC: 11758111. DOI: 10.5114/reum/194107.


Value of Hounsfield units measured by chest computed tomography for assessing bone density in the thoracolumbar segment of the thoracic spine.

Xue C, Sun G, Wang N, Liu X, He G, Wei Y Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(3):336-345.

PMID: 38917853 PMC: 11222884. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0438.


Semi-automatic proximal humeral trabecular bone density assessment tool: technique application and clinical validation.

Guo D, Weng Y, Yu Z, Li S, Qu W, Liu X Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(6):1049-1059.

PMID: 38459138 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07047-y.


Quantification of bone quality and distribution of the proximal humerus with dual-energy computed tomography.

Yu Q, Yang J, Zhou C, Xu Z, Liu C, Luo Q Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(9):5676-5687.

PMID: 37711831 PMC: 10498250. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-927.


Prediction of osteoporosis from proximal femoral cortical bone thickness and Hounsfield unit value with clinical significance.

Xu G, Wang D, Zhang H, Xu C, Li H, Zhang W Front Surg. 2023; 9:1047603.

PMID: 36684322 PMC: 9852615. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1047603.

References
1.
Habashy A, Yan X, Brown J, Xiong X, Kaste S . Estimation of bone mineral density in children from diagnostic CT images: a comparison of methods with and without an internal calibration standard. Bone. 2010; 48(5):1087-94. PMC: 4780050. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.012. View

2.
Schulze-Hagen M, Hubel C, Meier-Schroers M, Yuksel C, Sander A, Sahn M . Low-Dose Chest CT for the Diagnosis of COVID-19—A Systematic, Prospective Comparison With PCR. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020; 117(22-23):389-395. PMC: 7465363. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0389. View

3.
Wang L, Su Y, Wang Q, Duanmu Y, Yang M, Yi C . Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):6284. PMC: 5524691. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y. View

4.
Salzmann S, Shirahata T, Yang J, Miller C, Carlson B, Rentenberger C . Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?. Spine J. 2018; 19(4):695-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.007. View

5.
Budoff M, Malpeso J, Zeb I, Gao Y, Li D, Choi T . Measurement of phantomless thoracic bone mineral density on coronary artery calcium CT scans acquired with various CT scanner models. Radiology. 2013; 267(3):830-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13111987. View