» Articles » PMID: 33751686

Machine Learning Solutions for Osteoporosis-A Review

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 22
PMID 33751686
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteoporosis and its clinical consequence, bone fracture, is a multifactorial disease that has been the object of extensive research. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have enabled the field of artificial intelligence (AI) to make impressive breakthroughs in complex data environments where human capacity to identify high-dimensional relationships is limited. The field of osteoporosis is one such domain, notwithstanding technical and clinical concerns regarding the application of ML methods. This qualitative review is intended to outline some of these concerns and to inform stakeholders interested in applying AI for improved management of osteoporosis. A systemic search in PubMed and Web of Science resulted in 89 studies for inclusion in the review. These covered one or more of four main areas in osteoporosis management: bone properties assessment (n = 13), osteoporosis classification (n = 34), fracture detection (n = 32), and risk prediction (n = 14). Reporting and methodological quality was determined by means of a 12-point checklist. In general, the studies were of moderate quality with a wide range (mode score 6, range 2 to 11). Major limitations were identified in a significant number of studies. Incomplete reporting, especially over model selection, inadequate splitting of data, and the low proportion of studies with external validation were among the most frequent problems. However, the use of images for opportunistic osteoporosis diagnosis or fracture detection emerged as a promising approach and one of the main contributions that ML could bring to the osteoporosis field. Efforts to develop ML-based models for identifying novel fracture risk factors and improving fracture prediction are additional promising lines of research. Some studies also offered insights into the potential for model-based decision-making. Finally, to avoid some of the common pitfalls, the use of standardized checklists in developing and sharing the results of ML models should be encouraged. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Citing Articles

PrOsteoporosis: predicting osteoporosis risk using NHANES data and machine learning approach.

Si Z, Zhang D, Wang H, Zheng X BMC Res Notes. 2025; 18(1):108.

PMID: 40069865 PMC: 11899459. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-025-07089-3.


Using statistical modelling and machine learning in detecting bone properties: A systematic review protocol.

Abdelhay O, Alshoubaki R, Murad S, Abdel-Hafez O, Abdelhay Q, Haddad B PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0319583.

PMID: 40067789 PMC: 11896029. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319583.


A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation for osteoporosis prediction models.

Shams Alden Z, Ata O PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025; 10:e2338.

PMID: 39896405 PMC: 11784534. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2338.


A simple and user-friendly machine learning model to detect osteoporosis in health examination populations in Southern Taiwan.

Huang W, Chen I, Yu H, Chen C, Wu F, Hsu C Bone Rep. 2025; 24:101826.

PMID: 39896106 PMC: 11783436. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101826.


Comparison of Resampling Methods and Radiomic Machine Learning Classifiers for Predicting Bone Quality Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Gonzalez M, Fuertes Garcia J, Zanchetta M, Abdala R, Massa J Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857059 PMC: 11763683. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020175.