» Articles » PMID: 35804410

Mechanisms of Processing Speed Training and Transfer Effects Across the Adult Lifespan: Protocol of a Multi-site Cognitive Training Study

Overview
Journal BMC Psychol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Jul 8
PMID 35804410
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In recent years, cognitive training has gained popularity as a cost-effective and accessible intervention aiming at compensating for or even counteracting age-related cognitive declines during adulthood. Whereas the evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive training in general is inconsistent, processing speed training has been a notable successful exception, showing promising generalized benefits in untrained tasks and everyday cognitive functioning. The goal of this study is to investigate why and when processing speed training can lead to transfer across the adult lifespan. Specifically, we will test (1) whether training-induced changes in the rate of evidence accumulation underpin transfer to cognitive performance in untrained contexts, and (2) whether these transfer effects increase with stronger attentional control demands of the training tasks.

Methods: We will employ a multi-site, longitudinal, double-blinded and actively controlled study design with a target sample size of N = 400 adult participants between 18 and 85 years old. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three processing speed training interventions with varying attentional control demands (choice reaction time, switching, or dual tasks) which will be compared to an active control group training simple reaction time tasks with minimal attentional control demands. All groups will complete 10 home-based training sessions comprising three tasks. Training gains, near transfer to the untrained tasks of the other groups, and far transfer to working memory, inhibitory control, reasoning, and everyday cognitive functioning will be assessed in the laboratory directly before, immediately after, and three months after training (i.e., pretest, posttest, and follow-up, respectively). We will estimate the rate of evidence accumulation (drift rate) with diffusion modeling and conduct latent-change score modeling for hypothesis testing.

Discussion: This study will contribute to identifying the cognitive processes that change when training speeded tasks with varying attentional control demands across the adult lifespan. A better understanding of how processing speed training affects specific cognitive mechanisms will enable researchers to maximize the effectiveness of cognitive training in producing broad transfer to psychologically meaningful everyday life outcomes. Trial registration Open Science Framework Registries, registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/J5G7E ; date of registration: 9 May 2022.

Citing Articles

Elusive Gains of Cognitive Training: Limited Effects on Neural Activity Across Sessions.

Juras L, Vranic A, Hromatko I Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851390 PMC: 11764387. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010022.


Exploring the General Acceptability and User Experience of a Digital Therapeutic for Cognitive Training in a Singaporean Older Adult Population: Qualitative Study.

Kwek S, Leong Q, Lee V, Lau N, Vijayakumar S, Ng W JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e63568.

PMID: 39805580 PMC: 11773276. DOI: 10.2196/63568.


Effects and mechanisms of computerized cognitive training in Huntington's disease: protocol for a pilot study.

Huynh K, Jamadar S, Stout J, Voigt K, Lampit A, Georgiou-Karistianis N Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2025; 14(6):203-216.

PMID: 39781626 PMC: 11730119. DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0001.


Effective engagement in computerized cognitive training for older adults.

Guimaraes A, Lin F, Panizzutti R, Turnbull A Ageing Res Rev. 2025; 104:102650.

PMID: 39755175 PMC: 11807753. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102650.


High-Frequency Cognitive Control Training for Depression: Case Report.

Vander Zwalmen Y, Hoorelbeke K, Demeester D, Koster E JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e56598.

PMID: 39612206 PMC: 11645507. DOI: 10.2196/56598.


References
1.
Lovden M, Brehmer Y, Li S, Lindenberger U . Training-induced compensation versus magnification of individual differences in memory performance. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:141. PMC: 3351801. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00141. View

2.
Lovibond P, LOVIBOND S . The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(3):335-43. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. View

3.
Kail R, Salthouse T . Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1994; 86(2-3):199-225. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90003-5. View

4.
Wiecki T, Sofer I, Frank M . HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python. Front Neuroinform. 2013; 7:14. PMC: 3731670. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014. View

5.
Boot W, Charness N, Czaja S, Sharit J, Rogers W, Fisk A . Computer proficiency questionnaire: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. Gerontologist. 2013; 55(3):404-11. PMC: 4542703. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnt117. View