» Articles » PMID: 35793349

Differential Activation of a Frontoparietal Network Explains Population-level Differences in Statistical Learning from Speech

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jul 6
PMID 35793349
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People of all ages display the ability to detect and learn from patterns in seemingly random stimuli. Referred to as statistical learning (SL), this process is particularly critical when learning a spoken language, helping in the identification of discrete words within a spoken phrase. Here, by considering individual differences in speech auditory-motor synchronization, we demonstrate that recruitment of a specific neural network supports behavioral differences in SL from speech. While independent component analysis (ICA) of fMRI data revealed that a network of auditory and superior pre/motor regions is universally activated in the process of learning, a frontoparietal network is additionally and selectively engaged by only some individuals (high auditory-motor synchronizers). Importantly, activation of this frontoparietal network is related to a boost in learning performance, and interference with this network via articulatory suppression (AS; i.e., producing irrelevant speech during learning) normalizes performance across the entire sample. Our work provides novel insights on SL from speech and reconciles previous contrasting findings. These findings also highlight a more general need to factor in fundamental individual differences for a precise characterization of cognitive phenomena.

Citing Articles

Rats synchronize predictively to metronomes.

Rajendran V, Tsdaka Y, Keung T, Schnupp J, Nelken I iScience. 2024; 27(11):111053.

PMID: 39507253 PMC: 11539146. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111053.


The Domain-Specific Neural Basis of Auditory Statistical Learning in 5-7-Year-Old Children.

Fan T, Decker W, Schneider J Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024; 5(4):981-1007.

PMID: 39483699 PMC: 11527419. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00156.


Auditory-motor synchronization and perception suggest partially distinct time scales in speech and music.

Barchet A, Henry M, Pelofi C, Rimmele J Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):2.

PMID: 39242963 PMC: 11332030. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00053-6.


Replication of population-level differences in auditory-motor synchronization ability in a Norwegian-speaking population.

Sjuls G, Vulchanova M, Assaneo M Commun Psychol. 2024; 1(1):47.

PMID: 39242904 PMC: 11332004. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00049-2.


Limited but specific engagement of the mature language network during linguistic statistical learning.

Schneider J, Scott T, Legault J, Qi Z Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(4.

PMID: 38566510 PMC: 10987970. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae123.


References
1.
Toro J, Trobalon J . Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent. Percept Psychophys. 2005; 67(5):867-75. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193539. View

2.
Lancaster J, Woldorff M, Parsons L, Liotti M, Freitas C, Rainey L . Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000; 10(3):120-31. PMC: 6871915. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120::aid-hbm30>3.0.co;2-8. View

3.
Lopez-Barroso D, Catani M, Ripolles P, DellAcqua F, Rodriguez-Fornells A, de Diego-Balaguer R . Word learning is mediated by the left arcuate fasciculus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(32):13168-73. PMC: 3740909. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301696110. View

4.
Lizcano-Cortes F, Gomez-Varela I, Mares C, Wallisch P, Orpella J, Poeppel D . Speech-to-Speech Synchronization protocol to classify human participants as high or low auditory-motor synchronizers. STAR Protoc. 2022; 3(2):101248. PMC: 8931471. DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101248. View

5.
Poeppel D, Assaneo M . Speech rhythms and their neural foundations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020; 21(6):322-334. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-0304-4. View