» Articles » PMID: 33137084

Integrating when and What Information in the Left Parietal Lobe Allows Language Rule Generalization

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Nov 2
PMID 33137084
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A crucial aspect when learning a language is discovering the rules that govern how words are combined in order to convey meanings. Because rules are characterized by sequential co-occurrences between elements (e.g., "These cupcakes are unbelievable"), tracking the statistical relationships between these elements is fundamental. However, purely bottom-up statistical learning alone cannot fully account for the ability to create abstract rule representations that can be generalized, a paramount requirement of linguistic rules. Here, we provide evidence that, after the statistical relations between words have been extracted, the engagement of goal-directed attention is key to enable rule generalization. Incidental learning performance during a rule-learning task on an artificial language revealed a progressive shift from statistical learning to goal-directed attention. In addition, and consistent with the recruitment of attention, functional MRI (fMRI) analyses of late learning stages showed left parietal activity within a broad bilateral dorsal frontoparietal network. Critically, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on participants' peak of activation within the left parietal cortex impaired their ability to generalize learned rules to a structurally analogous new language. No stimulation or rTMS on a nonrelevant brain region did not have the same interfering effect on generalization. Performance on an additional attentional task showed that this rTMS on the parietal site hindered participants' ability to integrate "what" (stimulus identity) and "when" (stimulus timing) information about an expected target. The present findings suggest that learning rules from speech is a two-stage process: following statistical learning, goal-directed attention-involving left parietal regions-integrates "what" and "when" stimulus information to facilitate rapid rule generalization.

Citing Articles

Editorial: The musical brain, volume II.

Fritz J, Belfi A, Grahn J, Iversen J, Peretz I, Zatorre R Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1424961.

PMID: 39135734 PMC: 11317425. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1424961.


Auditory cortical regions show resting-state functional connectivity with the default mode-like network in echolocating bats.

Washington S, Shattuck K, Steckel J, Peremans H, Jonckers E, Hinz R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(27):e2306029121.

PMID: 38913894 PMC: 11228507. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306029121.


"What" and "when" predictions modulate auditory processing in a mutually congruent manner.

Cappotto D, Luo D, Lai H, Peng F, Melloni L, Schnupp J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1180066.

PMID: 37781257 PMC: 10540699. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1180066.


What made us "hunter-gatherers of words".

Boeckx C Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1080861.

PMID: 36845441 PMC: 9947416. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1080861.


Differential activation of a frontoparietal network explains population-level differences in statistical learning from speech.

Orpella J, Assaneo M, Ripolles P, Noejovich L, Lopez-Barroso D, de Diego-Balaguer R PLoS Biol. 2022; 20(7):e3001712.

PMID: 35793349 PMC: 9292101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001712.


References
1.
Corbetta M, Shulman G . Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(3):201-15. DOI: 10.1038/nrn755. View

2.
Siegelman N, Bogaerts L, Frost R . Measuring individual differences in statistical learning: Current pitfalls and possible solutions. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 49(2):418-432. PMC: 5011036. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0719-z. View

3.
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini P, Pascual-Leone A . Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(12):2008-2039. PMC: 3260536. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. View

4.
Siegelman N, Bogaerts L, Kronenfeld O, Frost R . Redefining "Learning" in Statistical Learning: What Does an Online Measure Reveal About the Assimilation of Visual Regularities?. Cogn Sci. 2017; 42 Suppl 3:692-727. PMC: 5889756. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12556. View

5.
Jones M, Moynihan H, MacKenzie N, Puente J . Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(4):313-9. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00458. View