» Articles » PMID: 36855868

Explaining Flexible Continuous Speech Comprehension from Individual Motor Rhythms

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 1
PMID 36855868
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When speech is too fast, the tracking of the acoustic signal along the auditory pathway deteriorates, leading to suboptimal speech segmentation and decoding of speech information. Thus, speech comprehension is limited by the temporal constraints of the auditory system. Here we ask whether individual differences in auditory-motor coupling strength in part shape these temporal constraints. In two behavioural experiments, we characterize individual differences in the comprehension of naturalistic speech as function of the individual synchronization between the auditory and motor systems and the preferred frequencies of the systems. Obviously, speech comprehension declined at higher speech rates. Importantly, however, both higher auditory-motor synchronization and higher spontaneous speech motor production rates were predictive of better speech-comprehension performance. Furthermore, performance increased with higher working memory capacity (digit span) and higher linguistic, model-based sentence predictability-particularly so at higher speech rates and for individuals with high auditory-motor synchronization. The data provide evidence for a model of speech comprehension in which individual flexibility of not only the motor system but also auditory-motor synchronization may play a modulatory role.

Citing Articles

The human auditory cortex concurrently tracks syllabic and phonemic timescales via acoustic spectral flux.

Giroud J, Trebuchon A, Mercier M, Davis M, Morillon B Sci Adv. 2024; 10(51):eado8915.

PMID: 39705351 PMC: 11661434. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ado8915.


Auditory-motor synchronization and perception suggest partially distinct time scales in speech and music.

Barchet A, Henry M, Pelofi C, Rimmele J Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):2.

PMID: 39242963 PMC: 11332030. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00053-6.


Replication of population-level differences in auditory-motor synchronization ability in a Norwegian-speaking population.

Sjuls G, Vulchanova M, Assaneo M Commun Psychol. 2024; 1(1):47.

PMID: 39242904 PMC: 11332004. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00049-2.


A novel method for estimating properties of attentional oscillators reveals an age-related decline in flexibility.

Kaya E, Kotz S, Henry M Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38904659 PMC: 11192533. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90735.


Speech Prosody Serves Temporal Prediction of Language via Contextual Entrainment.

Lamekina Y, Titone L, Maess B, Meyer L J Neurosci. 2024; 44(28).

PMID: 38839302 PMC: 11236583. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1041-23.2024.


References
1.
Doelling K, Arnal L, Ghitza O, Poeppel D . Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. Neuroimage. 2013; 85 Pt 2:761-8. PMC: 3839250. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.035. View

2.
Poeppel D, Assaneo M . Speech rhythms and their neural foundations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020; 21(6):322-334. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-0304-4. View

3.
Giroud J, Pesnot Lerousseau J, Pellegrino F, Morillon B . The channel capacity of multilevel linguistic features constrains speech comprehension. Cognition. 2022; 232:105345. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105345. View

4.
Luo H, Poeppel D . Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron. 2007; 54(6):1001-10. PMC: 2703451. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.004. View

5.
Ghitza O . The theta-syllable: a unit of speech information defined by cortical function. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:138. PMC: 3602725. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00138. View