» Articles » PMID: 35737066

An Interlaboratory Comparison Study of Regulated and Emerging Mycotoxins Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Future Directions of Routine Multi-Mycotoxin Analysis Including Emerging Mycotoxins

Abstract

The present interlaboratory comparison study involved nine laboratories located throughout the world that tested for 24 regulated and non-regulated mycotoxins by applying their in-house LC-MS/MS multi-toxin method to 10 individual lots of 4 matrix commodities, including complex chicken and swine feed, soy and corn gluten. In total, more than 6000 data points were collected and analyzed statistically by calculating a consensus value in combination with a target standard deviation following a modified Horwitz equation. The performance of each participant was evaluated by a z-score assessment with a satisfying range of ±2, leading to an overall success rate of 70% for all tested compounds. Equal performance for both regulated and emerging mycotoxins indicates that participating routine laboratories have successfully expanded their analytical portfolio in view of potentially new regulations. In addition, the study design proved to be fit for the purpose of providing future certified reference materials, which surpass current analyte matrix combinations and exceed the typical scope of the regulatory framework.

Citing Articles

Introduction to This Special Issue of : Reduction and Control of Mycotoxins along Entire Food and Feed Chain.

Malachova A, Sopel M, Ezekiel C Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36828445 PMC: 9961339. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15020131.


Recent advances in immunoassay-based mycotoxin analysis and toxicogenomic technologies.

Liew W, Sabran M J Food Drug Anal. 2023; 30(4):549-561.

PMID: 36753365 PMC: 9910299. DOI: 10.38212/2224-6614.3430.

References
1.
Ropejko K, Twaruzek M . Zearalenone and Its Metabolites-General Overview, Occurrence, and Toxicity. Toxins (Basel). 2021; 13(1). PMC: 7825134. DOI: 10.3390/toxins13010035. View

2.
Bao L, Bao Z, Zhang Y, Liang C, Lu N, Liu X . Aflatoxin testing in peanuts: a proficiency assessment scheme for Chinese analytic laboratories. J AOAC Int. 2009; 92(2):481-6. View

3.
Haggblom P, Nordkvist E . Deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and Fusarium graminearum contamination of cereal straw; field distribution; and sampling of big bales. Mycotoxin Res. 2015; 31(2):101-7. PMC: 4412695. DOI: 10.1007/s12550-015-0220-z. View

4.
Eskola M, Kos G, Elliott C, Hajslova J, Mayar S, Krska R . Worldwide contamination of food-crops with mycotoxins: Validity of the widely cited 'FAO estimate' of 25. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019; 60(16):2773-2789. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570. View

5.
Steiner D, Malachova A, Sulyok M, Krska R . Challenges and future directions in LC-MS-based multiclass method development for the quantification of food contaminants. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020; 413(1):25-34. PMC: 7801304. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-03015-7. View