» Articles » PMID: 35680026

Heterogeneity of Enhancers Embodies Shared and Representative Functional Groups Underlying Developmental and Cell Type-specific Gene Regulation

Overview
Journal Gene
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2022 Jun 9
PMID 35680026
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While enhancers in a particular tissue coordinately fulfill regulatory functions, these functions are heterogeneous in nature and comprise of multiple enhancer subclasses and the associated regulatory mechanisms. In this work, we used multiple cell lines to identify enhancer subclasses linked to development, differentiation, and cellular identity. We found that enhancer functional heterogeneity during development encompasses subclasses of ubiquitous functions (11%), development specific regulatory activity (62%), and chromatin interactions (12%). In differentiated cell lines, ubiquitous enhancers (10%) stay active across multiple cell lines.They are accompanied by a large enhancer subclass (ranging from 33% to 63%) with functions specific to the corresponding lineage. The remaining enhancers (27-40%) establish regulatory chromatin structure and facilitate interactions of cell type-specific enhancers with their target promoters. In addition to specialized functions of cell type-specific enhancers, we show that proper accounting of enhancer heterogeneity leads to a 10% increase in accuracy of enhancer classification, which significantly improves the modeling of enhancers and identification of underlying regulatory mechanisms. In summary, our observations suggest that although cell type-specific enhancers are heterogeneous and coordinate different regulatory programs, enhancers from different cell lines maintain common categories of functional groups across developmental and differentiation stages, indicating a higher order rule followed by enhancer-gene regulation.

References
1.
Kazemian M, Zhu Q, Halfon M, Sinha S . Improved accuracy of supervised CRM discovery with interpolated Markov models and cross-species comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(22):9463-72. PMC: 3239187. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr621. View

2.
Arbel H, Basu S, Fisher W, Hammonds A, Wan K, Park S . Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(3):900-908. PMC: 6338827. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1808833115. View

3.
Osterwalder M, Barozzi I, Tissieres V, Fukuda-Yuzawa Y, Mannion B, Afzal S . Enhancer redundancy provides phenotypic robustness in mammalian development. Nature. 2018; 554(7691):239-243. PMC: 5808607. DOI: 10.1038/nature25461. View

4.
Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, Hoof I, Bornholdt J, Boyd M . An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014; 507(7493):455-461. PMC: 5215096. DOI: 10.1038/nature12787. View

5.
Rao S, Huntley M, Durand N, Stamenova E, Bochkov I, Robinson J . A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014; 159(7):1665-80. PMC: 5635824. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021. View