» Articles » PMID: 35673871

The Correlated Evolution of Foraging Mode and Reproductive Effort in Lizards

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 8
PMID 35673871
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Life-history theory suggests that the optimal reproductive effort of an organism is affected by factors such as energy acquisition and predation risk. The observation that some organisms actively search for their prey and others ambush them creates the expectation of different energy needs and predation risk associated with each foraging behaviour, the so-called 'foraging-mode paradigm'. Although this paradigm has been around for decades, the empirical evidence consists of conflicting results derived from competing models based on different mechanisms. For instance, models within the foraging-mode paradigm suggest that widely foraging females have evolved low reproductive effort, because a heavy reproductive load decreases their ability to escape from predators. By contrast, a long-standing prediction of evolutionary theory indicates that organisms subject to high extrinsic mortality, should invest more in reproduction. Here, we present the first partial evidence that widely foraging species have evolved greater reproductive effort than have sit-and-wait species, which we attribute to a larger body size and greater mortality among mobile foragers. According to our findings, we propose a theoretical model that could explain the observed pattern in lizards, suggesting ways for evolutionary ecologists to test mechanistic hypotheses at the intraspecific level.

Citing Articles

Latitudinal patterns of tree β-diversity and relevant ecological processes vary across spatial extents in forests of southeastern China.

Liu M, Wu W, Wang K, Ren X, Zhang X, Wang L Plant Divers. 2025; 47(1):89-97.

PMID: 40041553 PMC: 11873649. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2024.11.003.


The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive effort in lizards.

Padilla Perez D, DeNardo D, Angilletta Jr M Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1976):20220180.

PMID: 35673871 PMC: 9174732. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0180.

References
1.
Huey R, Miles D, Pianka E . Seasonality in Kgalagadi Lizards: Inferences from Legacy Data. Am Nat. 2021; 198(6):759-771. DOI: 10.1086/716895. View

2.
Shine R . "Costs" of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia. 2017; 46(1):92-100. DOI: 10.1007/BF00346972. View

3.
Glaudas X, Glennon K, Martins M, Luiselli L, Fearn S, Trembath D . Foraging mode, relative prey size and diet breadth: A phylogenetically explicit analysis of snake feeding ecology. J Anim Ecol. 2019; 88(5):757-767. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12972. View

4.
Huelsenbeck J, Nielsen R, Bollback J . Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst Biol. 2003; 52(2):131-58. DOI: 10.1080/10635150390192780. View

5.
Barneche D, Robertson D, White C, Marshall D . Fish reproductive-energy output increases disproportionately with body size. Science. 2018; 360(6389):642-645. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao6868. View