» Articles » PMID: 28309450

Contrasts in Energy Intake and Expenditure in Sit-and-wait and Widely Foraging Lizards

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28309450
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Daily energy metabolism and water flux were measured with doubly labeled water in the free-living insectivorous lizards Cnemidophorus tigris (mean body mass 15.7 g) and Callisaurus draconoides (8.6 g) in June 1979 in the Colorado Desert of California. C. tigris was an active forager; it spent 91% of its 5-h daily activity period in movement. C. draconoides was a sit-and-wait predator; it spent less than 2% of its 10-h activity period in movement. C. tigris had significantly higher rates of field energy metabolism and water influx (210 Jg day, 36.8 ul HO g day, N=19) than C. draconoides (136, 17.1, N=18). There were no significant differences between the sexes within either species.The extra costs of free existence were calculated from differences between field metabolic rates and maintenance costs estimated from laboratory respirometry. Rates of energy metabolism during the field activity period were about 1.5x resting levels at 40° C (∼field active body temperature) for C. draconoides and 3.3 x resting levels at 40° C (∼field active body temperature) for the more active C. tigris. Feeding rates calculated from water influx data were 13.3 mg g day for C. tigris and 5.8 mg g day for C. draconoides. Though C. tigris had a high rate of energy expenditure, its foraging efficiency [Formula: see text] was higher than C. draconoides'.

Citing Articles

Biological pest regulation can benefit from diverse predation modes.

Ghosh D, Borzee A R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(9):240535.

PMID: 39295914 PMC: 11407875. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240535.


Climate warming drives a temperate-zone lizard to its upper thermal limits, restricting activity, and increasing energetic costs.

Doucette L, P Duncan R, Osborne W, Evans M, Georges A, Gruber B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9603.

PMID: 37311881 PMC: 10264393. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35087-7.


The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive effort in lizards.

Padilla Perez D, DeNardo D, Angilletta Jr M Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1976):20220180.

PMID: 35673871 PMC: 9174732. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0180.


Ecophysiological determinants of sexual size dimorphism: integrating growth trajectories, environmental conditions, and metabolic rates.

Chelini M, DeLong J, Hebets E Oecologia. 2019; 191(1):61-71.

PMID: 31432247 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04488-9.


The energetic consequences of behavioral variation in a marine carnivore.

McHuron E, Peterson S, Huckstadt L, Melin S, Harris J, Costa D Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(8):4340-4351.

PMID: 29721302 PMC: 5916299. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3983.


References
1.
Carpenter F, MacMillen R . Energetic cost of feeding territories in an Hawaiian honeycreeper. Oecologia. 2017; 26(3):213-223. DOI: 10.1007/BF00345290. View

2.
LIFSON N . Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. J Theor Biol. 1966; 12(1):46-74. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90185-8. View

3.
Licht P, Jones R . Effects of exogenous prolactin on reproduction and growth in adult males of the lizard Anolis carolinensis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1967; 8(2):228-44. DOI: 10.1016/0016-6480(67)90069-x. View

4.
Wood R, Nagy K, MACDONALD N, Wakakuwa S, Beckman R, Kaaz H . Determination of oxygen-18 in water contained in biological samples by charged particle activation. Anal Chem. 1975; 47(4):646-50. DOI: 10.1021/ac60354a038. View

5.
SCHMIDT-NIELSEN K . Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running. Science. 1972; 177(4045):222-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.177.4045.222. View