» Articles » PMID: 35642428

Dynamic Experimental Rigs for Investigation of Insect Wing Aerodynamics

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper provides a systematic and critical review of dynamic experimental rigs used for insect wing aerodynamics research. The goal is to facilitate meaningful comparison of data from existing rigs and provide insights for designers of new rigs. The scope extends from simple one degree of freedom rotary rigs to multi degrees of freedom rigs allowing various rotation and translation motions. Experimental methods are characterized using a consistent set of parameters that allows objective comparison of different approaches. A comprehensive catalogue is presented for the tested flow conditions (assessed through Reynolds number, Rossby number and advance ratio), wing morphologies (assessed through aspect ratio, planform shape and thickness to mean chord ratio) and kinematics (assessed through motion degrees of freedom). Links are made between the type of aerodynamic characteristics being studied and the type of experimental set-up used. Rig mechanical design considerations are assessed, and the aerodynamic measurements obtained from these rigs are discussed.

Citing Articles

Experimental study into the effects of pitch and coning angles on the flight performance of the natural samara.

Jung B, Rezgui D R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(9):240758.

PMID: 39351156 PMC: 11441657. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240758.


A simple model of wake capture aerodynamics.

Nabawy M J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(206):20230282.

PMID: 37751875 PMC: 10522412. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0282.


Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Broadley P, Nabawy M, Quinn M, Crowther W J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(191):20210909.

PMID: 35642428 PMC: 9156915. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0909.

References
1.
Lu H, Lua K, Lee Y, Lim T, Yeo K . Ground effect on the aerodynamics of three-dimensional hovering wings. Bioinspir Biomim. 2016; 11(6):066003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/066003. View

2.
Sane S, Dickinson M . The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 8):1087-96. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087. View

3.
Lehmann F . Aerial locomotion in flies and robots: kinematic control and aerodynamics of oscillating wings. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2007; 33(3):331-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2004.05.003. View

4.
Nabawy M, Crowther W . Aero-optimum hovering kinematics. Bioinspir Biomim. 2015; 10(4):044002. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/4/044002. View

5.
Birch J, Dickinson M . The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. J Exp Biol. 2003; 206(Pt 13):2257-72. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00381. View