» Articles » PMID: 22736891

The Aerodynamic Forces and Pressure Distribution of a Revolving Pigeon Wing

Overview
Journal Exp Fluids
Date 2012 Jun 28
PMID 22736891
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aerodynamic forces acting on a revolving dried pigeon wing and a flat card replica were measured with a propeller rig, effectively simulating a wing in continual downstroke. Two methods were adopted: direct measurement of the reaction vertical force and torque via a forceplate, and a map of the pressures along and across the wing measured with differential pressure sensors. Wings were tested at Reynolds numbers up to 108,000, typical for slow-flying pigeons, and considerably above previous similar measurements applied to insect and hummingbird wing and wing models. The pigeon wing out-performed the flat card replica, reaching lift coefficients of 1.64 compared with 1.44. Both real and model wings achieved much higher maximum lift coefficients, and at much higher geometric angles of attack (43°), than would be expected from wings tested in a windtunnel simulating translating flight. It therefore appears that some high-lift mechanisms, possibly analogous to those of slow-flying insects, may be available for birds flapping with wings at high angles of attack. The net magnitude and orientation of aerodynamic forces acting on a revolving pigeon wing can be determined from the differential pressure maps with a moderate degree of precision. With increasing angle of attack, variability in the pressure signals suddenly increases at an angle of attack between 33° and 38°, close to the angle of highest vertical force coefficient or lift coefficient; stall appears to be delayed compared with measurements from wings in windtunnels.

Citing Articles

Lessons from natural flight for aviation: then, now and tomorrow.

Harvey C, de Croon G, Taylor G, Bomphrey R J Exp Biol. 2023; 226(Suppl_1).

PMID: 37066792 PMC: 10263153. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245409.


Power requirements for bat-inspired flapping flight with heavy, highly articulated and cambered wings.

Fan X, Swartz S, Breuer K J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(194):20220315.

PMID: 36128710 PMC: 9490335. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0315.


Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Broadley P, Nabawy M, Quinn M, Crowther W J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(191):20210909.

PMID: 35642428 PMC: 9156915. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0909.


Range of motion in the avian wing is strongly associated with flight behavior and body mass.

Baliga V, Szabo I, Altshuler D Sci Adv. 2019; 5(10):eaaw6670.

PMID: 31681840 PMC: 6810231. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw6670.


The role of the leading edge vortex in lift augmentation of steadily revolving wings: a change in perspective.

Nabawy M, Crowther W J R Soc Interface. 2017; 14(132).

PMID: 28747395 PMC: 5550969. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0159.


References
1.
BERG , Rayner . The moment of inertia of bird wings and the inertial power requirement for flapping flight. J Exp Biol. 1995; 198(Pt 8):1655-64. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198.8.1655. View

2.
Askew G, Ellerby D . The mechanical power requirements of avian flight. Biol Lett. 2007; 3(4):445-8. PMC: 2390671. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0182. View

3.
Hedrick T, Daniel T . Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 16):3114-30. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02363. View

4.
OSBORNE M . Aerodynamics of flapping flight with application to insects. J Exp Biol. 1951; 28(2):221-45. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.28.2.221. View

5.
Dickson W, Dickinson M . The effect of advance ratio on the aerodynamics of revolving wings. J Exp Biol. 2004; 207(Pt 24):4269-81. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01266. View