» Articles » PMID: 35603913

Validating Transdermal Alcohol Biosensors: a Meta-analysis of Associations Between Blood/breath-based Measures and Transdermal Alcohol Sensor Output

Overview
Journal Addiction
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 May 23
PMID 35603913
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Transdermal alcohol sensors carry immense promise for the continuous assessment of drinking but are inconsistent in detecting more fine-grained indicators of alcohol consumption. Prior studies examining associations between transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) and blood/breath alcohol concentration (BAC) have yielded highly variable correlations and lag times. The current review aimed to synthesize transdermal validation studies, aggregating results from more than three decades of research to characterize the validity of transdermal sensors for assessing alcohol consumption.

Methods: Databases were searched for studies listed prior to 1 March 2022 that examined associations between transdermal alcohol sensor output and blood and breath-based alcohol measures, resulting in 31 primarily laboratory-derived participant samples (27 precise effect sizes) including both healthy and clinical populations. Correlation coefficients and lag times were pooled using three-level random-effects meta-regression. Independent raters coded study characteristics, including the body position of transdermal sensors (ankle- versus arm/hand/wrist-worn device) and methodological bias (e.g. missing data).

Results: Analyses revealed that, in this primarily laboratory-derived sample of studies, the average correlation between TAC and BAC was large in magnitude [r = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80, 0.93], and TAC lagged behind BAC by an average of 95.90 minutes (95% CI = 55.50, 136.29). Device body position significantly moderated both TAC-BAC correlation (b = 0.11, P = 0.009) and lag time (b = -69.41, P < 0.001). Lag times for ankle-worn devices were approximately double those for arm/hand/wrist-worn devices, and TAC-BAC correlations also tended to be stronger for arm/hand/wrist-worn sensors.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that transdermal alcohol sensors perform strongly in assessing blood/breath alcohol concentration under controlled conditions, with particular promise for the newer generation of wrist-worn devices.

Citing Articles

A wearable alcohol biosensor: Exploring the accuracy of transdermal drinking detection.

Fairbairn C, Han J, Caumiant E, Benjamin A, Bosch N Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024; 266:112519.

PMID: 39705818 PMC: 11787854. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112519.


Development of an accelerometer-based wearable sensor approach for alcohol consumption detection.

Bush N, Cushnie A, Sinclair M, Ahmed H, Schorn R, Xie T Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024; 48(12):2341-2351.

PMID: 39402006 PMC: 11629442. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15465.


Wearable Alcohol Monitoring Device for the Data-Driven Transcutaneous Alcohol Diffusion Model.

Jalal A, Arbabi S, Ahad M, Alam F, Ahmed M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39001012 PMC: 11244443. DOI: 10.3390/s24134233.


Integrating Alcohol Biosensors With Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) for Alcohol Use: a Synthesis of the Latest Literature and Directions for Future Research.

Wang Y, Porges E, DeFelice J, Fridberg D Curr Addict Rep. 2024; 11(2):191-198.

PMID: 38854904 PMC: 11155371. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-024-00543-5.


Novel medications for problematic alcohol use.

Heilig M, Witkiewitz K, Ray L, Leggio L J Clin Invest. 2024; 134(11).

PMID: 38828724 PMC: 11142745. DOI: 10.1172/JCI172889.


References
1.
Fairbairn C, Kang D, Bosch N . Using machine learning for real-time BAC estimation from a new-generation transdermal biosensor in the laboratory. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 216:108205. PMC: 7606553. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108205. View

2.
Karns-Wright T, Dougherty D, Hill-Kapturczak N, Mathias C, Roache J . The correspondence between transdermal alcohol monitoring and daily self-reported alcohol consumption. Addict Behav. 2018; 85:147-152. PMC: 6454572. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.006. View

3.
Nahum-Shani I, Smith S, Spring B, Collins L, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A . Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med. 2016; 52(6):446-462. PMC: 5364076. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8. View

4.
Van Den Noortgate W, Lopez-Lopez J, Marin-Martinez F, Sanchez-Meca J . Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: a multilevel approach. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 47(4):1274-1294. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0527-2. View

5.
Rash C, Petry N, Alessi S, Barnett N . Monitoring alcohol use in heavy drinking soup kitchen attendees. Alcohol. 2018; 81:139-147. PMC: 6453759. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.10.001. View