» Articles » PMID: 37754079

Flux-Type Versus Concentration-Type Sensors in Transdermal Measurements

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37754079
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

New transdermal biosensors measure analytes that diffuse from the bloodstream through the skin, making it important to reduce the system response time and understand measurement output. While highly customized models have been created for specific sensors, a generalized model for transdermal sensor systems is lacking. Here, a simple one-dimensional diffusion model was used to characterize the measurement system and classify biosensors as either flux types or concentration types. Results showed that flux-type sensors have significantly faster response times than concentration sensors. Furthermore, flux sensors do not measure concentration, but rather have an output measurement that is proportional to skin permeability. These findings should lead to an improved understanding of transdermal measurements and their relation to blood analyte concentration. In the realm of alcohol research, where the majority of commercially available sensors are flux types, our work advocates toward moving away from transdermal alcohol concentration as a metric, and instead suggests embracing transdermal alcohol flux as a more suitable alternative.

Citing Articles

Update on Patient Self-Testing with Portable and Wearable Devices: Advantages and Limitations.

Lippi G, Pighi L, Mattiuzzi C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335715 PMC: 11431615. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14182037.

References
1.
Karns-Wright T, Roache J, Hill-Kapturczak N, Liang Y, Mullen J, Dougherty D . Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016; 52(1):35-41. PMC: 5169032. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agw058. View

2.
Fairbairn C, Kang D . Temporal Dynamics of Transdermal Alcohol Concentration Measured via New-Generation Wrist-Worn Biosensor. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019; 43(10):2060-2069. PMC: 6779481. DOI: 10.1111/acer.14172. View

3.
Wang T, Kasting G, Nitsche J . A multiphase microscopic diffusion model for stratum corneum permeability. I. Formulation, solution, and illustrative results for representative compounds. J Pharm Sci. 2006; 95(3):620-48. DOI: 10.1002/jps.20509. View

4.
Ullah S, Hamade F, Bubniene U, Engblom J, Ramanavicius A, Ramanaviciene A . In-vitro model for assessing glucose diffusion through skin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018; 110:175-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.03.039. View

5.
Anderson J, Hlastala M . The kinetics of transdermal ethanol exchange. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005; 100(2):649-55. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00927.2005. View