» Articles » PMID: 35581675

Comparison of Recurrence Risk Between Patients with Clinically Node-positive and -negative Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Overview
Journal Thorac Cancer
Date 2022 May 17
PMID 35581675
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identifying patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at increased risk of tumor recurrence following surgery remains a major challenge. The current study aimed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) rates after surgery between patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) and -negative (cN0) stage I NSCLC.

Methods: Patients with pathological stage I resected NSCLC were identified from the lung cancer database of Changhua Christian Hospital in Taiwan. Patients with clinical N status 1 or 2 and pathological N status 0 were identified as the cN+/pN0 cohort, whereas others were identified as the cN0/pN0 cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between both cohorts. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate DFS.

Results: From January 2010 to July 2019, 754 eligible patients were enrolled into the study, among whom 41 (5.4%) were cN+/pN0. The median follow-up time was 43.4 months. Before PSM, the 5-year DFS rate was 79.0% and 90.3% in cN+/pN0 and cN0/pN0 cohorts (log-rank test, p = 0.009), respectively. After a 1:4 PSM, multivariate analysis showed that the cN+/pN0 cohort still had a poorer DFS compared to the cN0/pN0 cohort in (hazard ratio, 3.17; p = 0.040).

Conclusion: Among patients with stage I resected NSCLC, cN+ patients had a worse DFS compared to cN0 patients. Surgeons should therefore consider more aggressive adjuvant therapy or frequent follow-up in patients with surgically resected stage I NSCLC with cN+ status.

Citing Articles

Comparison of recurrence risk between patients with clinically node-positive and -negative stage I non-small cell lung cancer following surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.

Huang K, Chen H, Lin C, Wang B, Cheng C, Lin S Thorac Cancer. 2022; 13(13):1933-1939.

PMID: 35581675 PMC: 9250836. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14462.

References
1.
Feng M, Yang X, Ma Q, He Y . Retrospective analysis for the false positive diagnosis of PET-CT scan in lung cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(42):e7415. PMC: 5662341. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007415. View

2.
Nicholson A, Chansky K, Crowley J, Beyruti R, Kubota K, Turrisi A . The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the Clinical and Pathologic Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung.... J Thorac Oncol. 2016; 11(3):300-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.10.008. View

3.
Rusch V, Hawes D, Decker P, Martin S, Abati A, Landreneau R . Occult metastases in lymph nodes predict survival in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: report of the ACOSOG Z0040 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(32):4313-9. PMC: 3221530. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.2500. View

4.
Sato T, Shimada Y, Mimae T, Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Ito H . The impact of pathological lymph node metastasis with lymphatic invasion on the survival of patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter study. Lung Cancer. 2021; 158:9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.05.029. View

5.
Detterbeck F, Boffa D, Kim A, Tanoue L . The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification. Chest. 2016; 151(1):193-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.010. View