» Articles » PMID: 27076932

Detection of Occult Tumor Cells in Regional Lymph Nodes is Associated with Poor Survival in PN0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2016 Apr 15
PMID 27076932
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: patients of pN0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with occult tumor cells (OTCs) in regional lymph nodes (LNs) are reported to have controversial prognostic outcomes.

Method: We pooled pN0 NSCLC patients with OTCs in LNs and compared with those without OTCs. Patient characteristics, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. HR greater than 1 conferred an increased hazard for patients with OTCs.

Results: Eighteen articles were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis and 15 studies provided sufficient data for extracting HRs for OS, resulting to 5 articles available for DFS analysis. The combined HRs of OS was 2.22 (95% CI, 1.87 to 2.64) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.71 to 3.36) for analysis of DFS. The similar trend was obtained in the subgroup analyses regarding detection methods and study type. Interestingly, even in the analysis of mean numbers of LNs dissection (MLND) intraoperatively, both subgroups (LNs/Pts. <12 and ≥12) illustrated significant HRs of OS (HR: 3.13, 95% CI, 2.17 to 4.52 in LNs/Pts. <12 subgroup and HR: 2.09, 95% CI, 1.63 to 2.68 in LNs/Pts. ≥12). The combined HR of OS in this section was 2.37 (95% CI, 1.63 to 2.68). No publication bias was detected in all the meta-analysis sections. The prognosis of patients with OTCs is inferior to those without OTCs in the terms of OS and DFS regardless of detection methods, study types and MLND.

Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with OTCs is inferior to those without OTCs in the terms of OS and DFS regardless of detection methods, study types and MLND.

Citing Articles

exploration of an endobronchial sentinel lymph node procedure in lung cancer for optimizing workflow and evaluating feasibility of novel imaging tools.

Ter Woerds D, Verhoeven R, van der Heide S, Verhagen A, Aarntzen E, van der Heijden E J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(2):291-299.

PMID: 36910083 PMC: 9992569. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-984.


Sentinel Lymph Node in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Assessment of Feasibility and Safety by Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Clinical Consequences.

Stasiak F, Seitlinger J, Streit A, Wollbrett C, Piccoli J, Siat J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36675751 PMC: 9866901. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010090.


Comparison of recurrence risk between patients with clinically node-positive and -negative stage I non-small cell lung cancer following surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.

Huang K, Chen H, Lin C, Wang B, Cheng C, Lin S Thorac Cancer. 2022; 13(13):1933-1939.

PMID: 35581675 PMC: 9250836. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14462.


RGD-modified nanoliposomes containing quercetin for lung cancer targeted treatment.

Zhou X, Liu H, Zhao H, Wang T Onco Targets Ther. 2018; 11:5397-5405.

PMID: 30214245 PMC: 6128275. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S169555.


Long-term outcomes after near-infrared sentinel lymph node mapping in non-small cell lung cancer.

Digesu C, Hachey K, Gilmore D, Khullar O, Tsukada H, Whang B J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 155(3):1280-1291.

PMID: 29248292 PMC: 5816699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.150.


References
1.
Rusch V, Hawes D, Decker P, Martin S, Abati A, Landreneau R . Occult metastases in lymph nodes predict survival in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: report of the ACOSOG Z0040 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(32):4313-9. PMC: 3221530. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.2500. View

2.
Tierney J, Stewart L, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes M . Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007; 8:16. PMC: 1920534. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16. View

3.
Rena O, Carsana L, Cristina S, Papalia E, Massera F, Errico L . Lymph node isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic significance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 32(6):863-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.014. View

4.
Ohta Y, Oda M, Wu J, Tsunezuka Y, Hiroshi M, Nonomura A . Can tumor size be a guide for limited surgical intervention in patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer? Assessment from the point of view of nodal micrometastasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122(5):900-6. DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.117626. View

5.
Franco M, Parra E, Takagaki T, Soares F, Capelozzi V . Detection of micrometastases in pN0 non-small cell lung cancer: an alternative method combining tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry. J Bras Pneumol. 2008; 34(3):129-35. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132008000300002. View